Hi:
I am trying to learn how to use my DE-5000 LCR meter, especially the capacitor testing parameters. I first tested a Cornell-Dubilier .1 ufd, 2000 volt, 10% polypropylene capacitor #942C20P1KF. The meter displayed a capacitance of .100 ufd, dissipation factor 0.000, ESR .01 ohm, phase angle -90 degrees. Test frequency of 100 KHZ. I was very pleased at these results.
But there seems to be an issue with the Quality Factor (Q) reading. The display reading will not settle down. It will wander down from 1200 to 908 and then begin to rise again. It seems to hang around 900 or so but never totally stabilizes. The issue is only at 100 kHz test frequency. At all other test frequencies, the Q displays "0L".
Apparently the actual Q at the lower frequencies is greater than 2000 as that appears to be the upper display limit.
Mica transmitting type capacitors do not suffer from the wandering Q reading. They display 0L at the 100 kHz test frequency. I am testing at 100 kHz since intended use of the polypropylene and micas is for Tesla Coil application which do operate at frequencies in the 200 kHz zone or higher.
The LCR meter offers 100 Hertz and 120 Hertz test frequencies, too. Somewhere I read that the 100 Hertz is for use in Europe where 50 Hertz is standard house service. And the 120 Hertz is for USA where 60 Hertz is standard. I assume I would use the 120 Hertz for a capacitor intended for a 60 Hertz application. But why the doubling of test frequency?
Finally, my DE-5000 LCR meter seems to be sensitive to a slightly weak 9 volt battery. Readings are greater with a fresh battery. And to top it off, readings are different when powered by its 9 volt switching type power supply.
I guess my last question for now concerns “Q” which I understand is the reciprocal of “dissipation factor”. I know that high Q is desirable in capacitors and inductors. But it is a dimensionless number. So what Q should I expect from capacitors? One ceramic capacitor displayed a Q of 80 while the micas apparently have a Q over 2000. Should the ceramic be considered faulty?
I would appreciate any incite to the above to help me understand how to interpret the reading and proper use of the LCR meter.
Thanks,
Ron