Author Topic: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?  (Read 6332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« on: June 07, 2015, 10:03:08 pm »
I have a General Resistance KV divider of 7 decades. I would rather take readings directly than use a bridged configuration.

The ideal output buffer would be an electrometer grade op amp configured as a non-inverting buffer. The problem is that these buffers seem to have 10 microvolt per degree temperature change.

Has anyone implemented such a buffer successfully for use with a KVD?
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Online Vgkid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2727
  • Country: us
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2015, 11:14:25 pm »
Why, most meters have a 10Gohm input impedance. Wont matter much.
If you own any North Hills Electronics gear, message me. L&N Fan
 

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2015, 11:28:59 pm »
The output impedance of the KVD is measured at about 25k ohms max. Using a 10G input impedance this creates at 2.5 ppm error. The error is dependent on the KVD setting.

The KVD has 0.1 ppm resolution. Using a DMM without a buffer wipes out the 7th decade and two counts of the 6th decade.

The error can be observed using Fluke 332A.
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6975
  • Country: nl
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2015, 01:14:45 am »
AD8638? Auto-zero, so negligible tempco for offset, with below pA typical bias current.
 

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2015, 05:24:44 pm »
AD8638? Auto-zero, so negligible tempco for offset, with below pA typical bias current.

Thank you for the suggestion. My reading of the datasheet reveals

Typical input bias current 1.5 pA, maximum 40 pA.  Not low enough
Input voltage range -0.1V to +3V  Not practical as a buffer

Please let me know if I missed something.
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Online edavid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3436
  • Country: us
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2015, 05:44:43 pm »
Jim Williams used an LTC1152 and LT1010 to achieve 0.4ppm error: http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/design-note/dsol11.pdf
 

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2015, 05:52:08 pm »
Jim Williams used an LTC1152 and LT1010 to achieve 0.4ppm error: http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/design-note/dsol11.pdf

Perfect! Thanks.
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2015, 06:06:42 pm »
Jim Williams used an LTC1152 and LT1010 to achieve 0.4ppm error: http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/design-note/dsol11.pdf

The datasheet for the LTC1152says that input bias current is +/- 10 pA typical and +/- 100pA max. I wonder if he ever evaluated the effect of the LTC1150 input bias on his KVD?
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Online edavid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3436
  • Country: us
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2015, 07:13:34 pm »
The datasheet for the LTC1152says that input bias current is +/- 10 pA typical and +/- 100pA max. I wonder if he ever evaluated the effect of the LTC1150 input bias on his KVD?

It's right there in his error budget.
 

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2015, 09:43:12 pm »
The datasheet for the LTC1152says that input bias current is +/- 10 pA typical and +/- 100pA max. I wonder if he ever evaluated the effect of the LTC1150 input bias on his KVD?

It's right there in his error budget.

Ok. I see it. Thanks for pointing it out. His KVD must be 10K ohms output to have 0.1 ppm error at 10 pA bias. That would be 0.25 ppm for my KVD. I guess obtaining some samples and measuring will be in order. It will be a good use of the 236 SMU.
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6975
  • Country: nl
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2015, 09:48:24 pm »
Typical input bias current 1.5 pA, maximum 40 pA.  Not low enough

You're not making electronics for an automotive environment here ... specs over temperature range are irrelevant.
Quote
Input voltage range -0.1V to +3V  Not practical as a buffer

You read the specs for 5V single ended supply, not the 16V supply (also you should feed it ~-2 to +14 to get better performance around 0).

The relevant bias current information for you is figure 14 page 7 (0.1 pA typical at 25 degrees Celsius). Worst case is irrelevant, test the IC and if it doesn't perform well enough try another till you get a typical one.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2015, 02:40:19 am by Marco »
 

Offline splin

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 999
  • Country: gb
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2015, 10:55:33 pm »
Jim Williams used an LTC1152 and LT1010 to achieve 0.4ppm error: http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/design-note/dsol11.pdf

Wonder why he chose the LTC1152 rather than the LTC1052C? Also interesting that the current datasheet specs are considerably worse than listed in that app note:


                                              LTC1052C  LTC1152   LTC1152 from Design Solution 11
Bias current (typ)   @ 25C           1pA          10pA     
Bias current (max)  @ 25C         30pA        100pA               50pA
Bias current (max) over Temp  175pA      1000pA     
Vos (typ)                                   0.5uV           1uV     
Vos (max)                                   5uV          10uV                5uV
Vos drift (typ)                           10nV/C       10nV/C             
Vos drift (max)                         50nV/C      100nV/C            50nV
0-10Hz Vnoise (typ)                1.5uV p-p        2uV p-p (0.1-10Hz)
CMRR  (min)                            120dB          115dB             110dB
CMRR  (typ)                            140dB          130dB   
Avol (min)                              120dB          110dB             140dB
Avol (typ)                               150dB          130dB   

[EDIT] Moved misplaced 50nV entry
« Last Edit: June 09, 2015, 09:05:07 am by splin »
 

Offline VintageNutTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: 00
Re: Buffer for Kelvin Varley Divider?
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2015, 04:14:48 am »
Typical input bias current 1.5 pA, maximum 40 pA.  Not low enough

You're not making electronics for an automotive environment here ... specs over temperature range are irrelevant.
Quote
Input voltage range -0.1V to +3V  Not practical as a buffer

You read the specs for 5V single ended supply, not the 16V supply (also you should feed it ~-2 to +14 to get better performance around 0).

The relevant bias current information for you is figure 14 page 7 (0.1 pA typical at 25 degrees Celsius). Worst case is irrelevant, test the IC and if it doesn't perform well enough try another till you get a typical one.

Which datasheet has input bias of 0.1 pA typical?
working instruments :Keithley 260,261,2750,7708, 2000 (calibrated), 2015, 236, 237, 238, 147, 220,  Rigol DG1032  PAR Model 128 Lock-In amplifier, Fluke 332A, Gen Res 4107 KVD, 4107D KVD, Fluke 731B X2 (calibrated), Fluke 5450A (calibrated)
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6975
  • Country: nl
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf