Author Topic: ALMOST a fluke  (Read 15082 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mianchenTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 225
  • Country: gb
ALMOST a fluke
« on: November 03, 2013, 01:26:19 pm »
Wow look at this amazing Victor VC189, only $360!  :-DMM

Why?! Why can't these manufacturers just sit down and design something more original, instead of trying to sell them like the "real thing"? :-//  :-- :-- :--
 

Offline BravoV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7549
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2013, 01:38:44 pm »
Simple, these kind of companies sole purpose are to make quick & easy money, and will abandon ship if business is showing any slightest sign that it won't generating easy money anymore. For sure they don't care shit about reputation. Oh yeah, by only sitting down alone (not designing yet  >:D) eats up resources like time & money and etc, let alone the designing job.

Expecting them to make something decent, unique and original from zero ? Forget about it.

Offline amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8338
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2013, 01:43:18 pm »
Sometimes something more original just won't be received well, so they'd rather be sticking to something familiar, tried-and-true instead. (E.g. Hakko 936 and all its clones...)
 

Offline quarros

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 153
  • Country: hu
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2013, 01:46:46 pm »
Why?! Why can't these manufacturers just sit down and design something more original, instead of trying to sell them like the "real thing"?

Would you buy one if it would be purple with "kello kitty" designed keys?  >:D
 

Offline Dark Prognosis

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 196
  • Country: us
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2013, 02:45:09 pm »
Why?! Why can't these manufacturers just sit down and design something more original, instead of trying to sell them like the "real thing"?

Would you buy one if it would be purple with "kello kitty" designed keys?  >:D
I know some female techs who would and this one guy but that dude is heavily into My Little Pony too.  We sort of let him alone and he does his thing.
 

Offline Bored@Work

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3932
  • Country: 00
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2013, 03:05:10 pm »
Sometimes something more original just won't be received well, so they'd rather be sticking to something familiar, tried-and-true instead. (E.g. Hakko 936 and all its clones...)

Come on, yes?

Hyping touchscreens when people want knobs?
Passing a 60 mm (that is 2 3/8 inch) brick of as a tablet?
Talking about a 10.1 inch tablet while the brick is actually 13.6 inch?
Calling that handheld?
Claiming isolation, but showing the bare naked metal BNC connectors?
Not willing to talk about prices?
Not willing to talk about availability?
Not even a demo video?
No apparent probe compensation output?
In fact only showing what could well be a mock-up and rendered images?

In my book that tbook thing is that close ---><--- to look like a marketing stunt or even a scam.

And the second thing is you should overcome that believe that new equals better.

I delete PMs unread. If you have something to say, say it in public.
For all else: Profile->[Modify Profile]Buddies/Ignore List->Edit Ignore List
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2013, 03:10:34 pm »
Sometimes something more original just won't be received well, so they'd rather be sticking to something familiar, tried-and-true instead. (E.g. Hakko 936 and all its clones...)

There's a wide gap between "something more original" as "completely reinvent oscilloscope interface", and "something more original" as "don't directly rip off the Fluke 189".
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline Wytnucls

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3045
  • Country: be
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2013, 03:39:18 pm »
Not much of a problem for Fluke anyway. Whoever buys this meter would never have acquired a Fluke in the first place. And anybody looking for a Fluke 189 should be savvy enough not to confuse the two. Imitation is the best form of flattery.
That said, at $360, this meter isn't cheap and hopefully, has been built to a higher standard than what Victor is used to, but I'm not all that confident.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 04:03:38 pm by Wytnucls »
 

Offline ElectroIrradiator

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 614
  • Country: dk
  • More analog than digital.
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #8 on: November 03, 2013, 05:02:32 pm »
It is not even that close to the real thing. Looks more like a mish/mash of the 189 and the 289... :-//
 

Offline M. András

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1014
  • Country: hu
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2013, 06:12:26 pm »
inside pictures? maybe the screen layout?
 

Offline sprocket

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 52
  • Country: dk
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #10 on: November 03, 2013, 06:17:03 pm »
Well i have one of those.. Needed a second meter to supplement my now dead SOAR4050B, so I just wanted a some thing cheap that wouldnt blow up in my face.

the one I have is a rebadged Batronix 280 something.. It's bit of a dog.. very slow at updating and continuous measurement is slow too, a good second before some thing goes beep. 
 

Offline markce

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: nl
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #11 on: November 03, 2013, 06:21:41 pm »
Just have a look at the probes they've included. Says enough for me...
Think you'd be better off with an entry level real Fluke.
 

Offline markce

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: nl
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #12 on: November 03, 2013, 06:32:13 pm »
Quote
Batronix 280 something
Batronix already dropped this model, Uni-T as follw-up.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 09:51:06 pm by markce »
 

Offline Wytnucls

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3045
  • Country: be
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #13 on: November 03, 2013, 08:18:14 pm »
 The Batronix 280 seems to be the older Victor 98 (22,000 count). The 'newer' 187/189 are 55,000 count meters.



Victor 189 specs:
http://www.china-victor.com/english/en/product_data.aspx?ClassID=168&ID=309
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 09:02:24 pm by Wytnucls »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 38084
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #14 on: November 03, 2013, 09:16:32 pm »
In fact only showing what could well be a mock-up and rendered images?
In my book that tbook thing is that close ---><--- to look like a marketing stunt or even a scam.

Nothing of the sort. It was displayed and demoed at a Hong Kong trade show, and even won an award.
 
The following users thanked this post: Marco1971

Offline markce

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: nl
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2013, 09:55:45 pm »
Based on Brymen internals pictures posted in another thread on this forum, I have withdrawn my
advice for this brand as an alternative. It seems to have decent input protection, but in my opinion,
board layout and construction is nowhere near Fluke level.
 

Offline JohnnyGringo

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Country: vg
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2013, 10:24:04 pm »
Wow look at this amazing ...., only $360!  :-DMM

Why?! Why can't these manufacturers just sit down and design something more original, instead of trying to sell them like the "real thing"? :-//  :-- :-- :--
  In the drug discovery world, this would be called a "fast follower". The concept is you take a very popular, high markup drug and attach just enough molecules to it to beat the patent.  You piggy-back to market on someone else's research & money.  That's why you see so many derivative products.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 10:32:07 pm by JohnnyGringo »
"Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new." - Albert Einstein
 

Offline retiredcaps

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3575
  • Country: ca
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2013, 10:42:11 pm »
the one I have is a rebadged Batronix 280 something.. It's bit of a dog.. very slow at updating and continuous measurement is slow too, a good second before some thing goes beep.
http://www.batronix.com/shop/multimeter/multimeter-bxm280.html

proudly states that the continuity test is "fast reaction time below 0.5 seconds!".

How about pictures of the inside?  ;)
 

Offline Lightages

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4314
  • Country: ca
  • Canadian po
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2013, 11:45:15 pm »
Based on Brymen internals pictures posted in another thread on this forum, I have withdrawn my
advice for this brand as an alternative. It seems to have decent input protection, but in my opinion,
board layout and construction is nowhere near Fluke level.

??? What are you talking about? The meter being discussed here? Another meter? Just all meters compared to Fluke?
 

Offline Wytnucls

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3045
  • Country: be
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #19 on: November 04, 2013, 09:49:19 am »
the one I have is a rebadged Batronix 280 something.. It's bit of a dog.. very slow at updating and continuous measurement is slow too, a good second before some thing goes beep.
http://www.batronix.com/shop/multimeter/multimeter-bxm280.html

proudly states that the continuity test is "fast reaction time below 0.5 seconds!".

How about pictures of the inside?  ;)
The Batronix 280 is a crippled or obsolete version of the Victor 98. 4,000 count instead of 22,000. Certainly doesn't have much in common with the Victor 189.
Incidentally, a good second-hand Fluke 189 can be bought for quite a bit less than a new Victor 189.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Fluke-189-True-RMS-Multimeter-W-Manual-Test-Leads-Case-WARRANTY-/261317085427?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3cd7b648f3
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 09:52:29 am by Wytnucls »
 

Offline markce

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: nl
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #20 on: November 04, 2013, 11:03:53 am »
Quote
What are you talking about?
Brymen 827
 

Offline amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8338
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #21 on: November 04, 2013, 11:04:30 am »
It's just a fluke, that it looks like a Fluke. :-DD
 

Offline omgfire

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 125
  • Country: ru
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #22 on: October 26, 2016, 10:12:43 am »

Supplement from szzotek.com
 

Offline wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17343
  • Country: lv
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2016, 10:21:40 am »
Beside digging a necro tread, these two meters are quiet different.

Supplement from szzotek.com
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16892
  • Country: 00
Re: ALMOST a fluke
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2016, 01:54:49 pm »
Beside digging a necro tread, these two meters are quiet different.

Agree. They look totally different. Different model number, different markings, different things on the dial, different color, different proportions, the Fluke looks physically bigger...

I don't see how anybody could confuse the two. -//
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf