Chris,
I advised him of the status of the device. Being a legitimate agent for the MoD they acted on the info immediately. They did their duty.
You are commenting on topics in my realm of operation here. This camera is designed to be part of a sophisticated weapons system that many unsavoury persons and countries would love to own. And don't try telling me they can get them on the open market anyway....they can't. The 'ugly' situation would have been the MoD chasing it down when the mistake was discovered, which is likely. Tax payers money wasted on the trace and investigation...no thanks.
You are exhibiting your naiveté on this topic, but not wanting to start an argument I am happy to leave you in ignorant bliss
That simply begs the question. After all, that person got it somewhere. And even was able to put it online. That has exactly nothing to do with being naive, it's simply a matter of fact. And if that person can get hold of it, so can others.
If the military boneheads think it is oh-so-important, the only way to make sure that nothing bad comes of it is to destroy that stuff by themselves. But money rules, i guess, thus the incentive to sell that stuff.
The only ones (if any) who should have gotten in any kind of ugly situation would be the military themselves, if the unit originated by them, and no one else. And frankly, i don't see anything ugly about that happening.
Seriously, what is the problem with common people having access to high-res thermal imaging cameras? I mean, the _real_ problem, beyond some folks think "oh, my precious" and not wanting others to have it? After all, isn't it those common people who funded the development, and later production, of that stuff anyways? Or where did the money come from?
I simply hate that lock-away mentality for such stuff. Some dangerous idiots, like real terrorists, will be able to get that stuff anyways, so it can't really be because of that purported risk. And after all, we are not talking about nuclear warheads here.
Greetings,
Chris