Author Topic: Hi power HF amplifiers  (Read 13372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
  • Country: ca
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #50 on: December 24, 2021, 06:20:37 pm »
I didn't realize people got credit for cable loss and got to make it up. If that is what you are proposing.
...
Also, how are directional antennas handled. .

In Canada at least we do not get credit for cable loss, the output is measured across a matched dummy load. And with this method, directionality of the antenna is irrelevant for the purpose of RF power legal limit.
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
  • Country: ca
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #51 on: December 26, 2021, 02:41:56 am »
Worked many QSOs with Americas, Europe and Russia on 20M with this mobile setup with an all-band 100W Icom and top loaded stick. The most interesting one was mobile-to-marine mobile with a guy on a cargo ship in the ocean somewhere near Florida, lol.

Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline M0HZH

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 211
  • Country: gb
    • QRPblog
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #52 on: January 02, 2022, 08:04:34 am »
I don't necessarily agree. On HF, once you have a decent setup antenna gain is generally more expensive than power gain, especially below 20m. For example, if you have a wire dipole in a tree at a good height, you will need a tower & 3-el Yagi to gain almost 3dB, on 7MHz that is a US$3000-4000 job; increasing power from 100 to 600W (almost 8dB) costs half that.

And receive capability is not about antenna gain but about S/N ratio, so increasing antenna gain does not directly translate to better receive (it receives more signal but also more noise).
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17086
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #53 on: January 02, 2022, 10:19:25 am »
And receive capability is not about antenna gain but about S/N ratio, so increasing antenna gain does not directly translate to better receive (it receives more signal but also more noise).

Directivity has a major influence on S/N, and improving directivity can be a major cost.
 

Offline A.Z.Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 967
  • Country: it
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #54 on: January 02, 2022, 10:26:00 am »
And receive capability is not about antenna gain but about S/N ratio, so increasing antenna gain does not directly translate to better receive (it receives more signal but also more noise).

Directivity has a major influence on S/N, and improving directivity can be a major cost.

well, I agree on diirectivity, but it isn't the only factor, as an example this antenna

http://www.kk5jy.net/LoG/

will give surprisingly good reception, but isn't so directive and is really cheap
 

Offline Theboel

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 278
  • Country: id
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #55 on: January 02, 2022, 02:41:39 pm »
I disagree with You about directivity try to build one if You want to see what I mean.

back to over legal limit I think I can Understand if legal limit is 1500w some one use 2500w amplifier to overcome cable loss etc but for people who use 5kw or more with legal limit only 1500w I think that is wrong thing to do.
 

Online coppercone2

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10486
  • Country: us
  • $
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #56 on: January 03, 2022, 06:08:26 am »
always keep in mind that some people have crazy transmission losses from say snow. Never would hurt to have extra power on hand for whatever reason in a critical situation, so long ERP is monitored.
 

Offline thinkfat

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2155
  • Country: de
  • This is just a hobby I spend too much time on.
    • Matthias' Hackerstübchen
Re: Hi power HF amplifiers
« Reply #57 on: January 03, 2022, 11:14:46 am »
I don't necessarily agree. On HF, once you have a decent setup antenna gain is generally more expensive than power gain, especially below 20m. For example, if you have a wire dipole in a tree at a good height, you will need a tower & 3-el Yagi to gain almost 3dB, on 7MHz that is a US$3000-4000 job; increasing power from 100 to 600W (almost 8dB) costs half that.

And receive capability is not about antenna gain but about S/N ratio, so increasing antenna gain does not directly translate to better receive (it receives more signal but also more noise).

Ever worked your way through a pile-up in CQWW? I've operated DL0TD for two or three years in CQWW SSB, I can attest to the value of antenna directivity :)

PS: do you know what a "crocodile" is?
Everybody likes gadgets. Until they try to make them.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf