Why would you want an expensive LifePo4 with all the added risks over a cheap and relatively safe sealed lead acid battery?
YMMV, but in my case with relatively frequent power outages SLA wouldn't last more than about a year (powercom kin-1000ap) with load no higher than 20% of nominal power. Besides, backup power run time with SLA was ridiculously low. After a few replacements in a few years, I got tired and decided to build a proper battery for it.
The LiFePO4 battery with which I replaced the original 2xSLA ones (admittedly of a larger physical size, for which I had to remove parts of the UPS'es metal frame inside) have now lasted over 4 years and is still going strong.
Also, if lead is already too much, then lifepo4 would double too much.
That lead price sounds insanely high, I would assume because it's APC branded.
eg: it looks like sla 24V 17ah is around €150 each. Lifepo4 is around €300 for only 10Ah.
Maybe if you search for the most expensive cells, I don't know. What I have in my UPS is a 8s3p LiFePO4 battery made of decent quality chinese 24x 32700 cells with a total cost of ~US$120. Add assembly costs, wires, connectors, an active balancer, ok, let's say $150 total. This is nominal 24V x 18Ah or, in practice, about 400-450 Wh measured (when new -- but based on run time it hasn't degraded much).
Now, you cannot compare same-Ah SLA and LiFePO4. The latter will provide at least 2-3 times more energy at full charge than the SLA of the same nominal Ah capacity. Capacity degradation over time will be absolutely incomparable as well.
SLAs suck. UPS is one of applications where they suck most prominently.