I recently acquired a HP 3310A for repair. The repair started out pretty straightforward, but I've now run into some difficulties.
When I first powered it on, I noted that all of the power supply rails were reading way off (low). I traced the problem to a bad 9V regulator diode (CR26) and a bad pass transistor (Q31). I replaced both of these parts and now the power rails are in specification (DC and AC).
Next, I noted that there was no output (other than a DC level) for all ranges of 10x and higher. The following descriptions are with the output amplitude set to the 9 o'clock position. They scale upwards as I increase the amplitude control. On 1x I get an output in sine, triangle, and pulse settings but the shape is completely wrong. On sine it is essentially +2V with some negative pulses on it. On triangle, it is -2V with a positive edge and a negative ramp followed by an equal duration of -2V before the cycle repeats. Dropping to 0.1x and lower the waveform expands to cover +/- 2V but the waveform shapes are still completely wrong.
Examining the output of the triangle amplifier at TP4 reveals that this is the source of the problem. On 1x, the output waveform only goes from 2.5-6.5V and only ramps up. On slower settings, it goes from -4 to 6.5V but again only ramps up.
I noted that Q18, Q19, and Q20 had been replaced in an earlier repair (NTE123, NTE128, and NTE129 respectively). A junction test of all of the transistors in the triangle amplifier circuit showed no problems. Same thing for all of the diodes in the circuit. I extended my testing to the +/-5V level detector. All of the transistor junctions appeared to be fine. However, when I tested the tunnel diodes, they tested as shorts in both directions (out of circuit). I know this is wrong so I eventually managed to get my hands on some replacements. The replacements measure around 0.5V drop in the forward direction as expected. I carefully placed them back into the sockets and confirmed the orientation matched that of the schematic. I powered the circuit back up to resume testing it but unfortunately the behavior remained the same.
The troubleshooting tree diagrams in the service manual were of no help, so I decided I would check DC voltage levels in the triangle amplifier and surrounding circuits to see if I could find the issue. Unfortunately, there appears to be an elaborate feedback loop between the current sources, triangle amplifier, +/-5V level detector, and low frequency feedback amplifier so I'm not sure how useful a bad voltage reading will be.
I found the voltages in the tuning amplifier and inverting amplifier were approximately correct. However, once I got into the bias network I started seeing some big anomalies. The emitter of A1Q5 was at 6.7V when it should have been +4V. A1Q5's collector was +6.6V instead of -1.5V. A1Q6's collector was 6.2V when it should have been -1.0V. However, A1Q6's emitter was -4.0V just as was indicated in the schematic. TP5 was 6.2V rather than the 1.2V it should have been. There were more discrepancies in the +/-5V level detector, but without breaking the feedback loop there was really no way for me to be sure where the root cause of the problem is.
I spent some time confirming junction voltages on all of the transistors, JFETs, and diodes in the bias network, +/-5V level detector, and low frequency amplifier circuits but found nothing else obviously bad. While testing CR1 and CR2 in the tuning amplifier and inverting amplifier with power on, I did observe that CR2 only had 4.4V across it rather than the 6.2V that CR1 had (they are both supposed to be 6.2V zeners). My schematic indicates that the output of A1IC2 should be -16.5V, but I believe that is an error and it should be +16.5. I was reading +19V here (as compared to -16.8V for the output of A1IC1). However, the voltages at TP2 and TP3 were nearly equal and opposite so I'm not sure this means much. CR2 may have been replaced in a past repair since it was not of the same type as CR1.
I'm looking for advice or suggestions for how to further troubleshoot this circuit. It looks like it should be possible to at least partially break the feedback from the current source and sink by disconnecting the leads from the junction switch to the A1 PCB. However, I'm fairly confident the current source and sink are operating correctly already so I'm not sure that buys me anything.
--
Walt