Author Topic: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors [fixed > broken again]  (Read 1840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline elektryk

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 100
  • Country: pl
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2024, 11:46:30 am »
2SC3320  also has VCEO=400V

From my experience MJE13009 are enough to drive 2 transducers 60W each.
 

Offline htmTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 43
  • Country: nl
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2024, 10:08:40 pm »
i've got an update and wondering what to do next;
transistors
i ordered a few SC3320 from aliexpress.com(€3.08 for 5 ???), ordered a few BUV48A(€4,24 for 1) from tme.eu and i salvaged 1 good transistor from the main board.
Then i used my new component tester :clap:. Turns out the AliExpress ones are all seen as a Diode!? (see attached picture)
How can that be? i mean, how wrong must the component be for the component tester to think it's a diode?

transducers
I measured the resistante between the two leads going to each set of 3 ultrasonic transducers. They show open loop.
But when in 'voltage meter DC' setting and connect the black lead to the black probe, and tap the red wire with the read probe, then the measured voltage increases with approx 10mv per tap, until it reaches 400mV and it resets. That happens for both sets of transducers. Not sure what that says though :-//

what next?
Should i just replace the broken components (transistors, fuse and diodes) and give it a go 🙈(after filling up the tank)
or is it better to first check if the transformers/inductors are still Ok. i'm not sure how to go about it though..
i have a simple function generator and a basic analog 10Mhz scope. Could i do something with that?
« Last Edit: August 09, 2024, 05:18:14 am by htm »
 

Offline fzabkar

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2521
  • Country: au
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #27 on: August 09, 2024, 10:18:01 am »
Perhaps the Ali parts have a C-E damper diode? I would perform a B-C and B-E diode test with your DMM.
 

Offline htmTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 43
  • Country: nl
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #28 on: August 09, 2024, 07:46:14 pm »
@fzabkar
Afaik, the C3320 has pin layout: 1(B) 2(C) 3(E)
The diode tests show:

BC
black on 1, red on 2 = OL
red on 1, black on 2= OL

CE
red on 2, black on 3 = OL
black on 2, red on 3 = 0.488V

BE
red on 1, black on 3 = OL
black on 1, red on 3 = OL
« Last Edit: August 09, 2024, 07:56:31 pm by htm »
 

Offline fzabkar

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2521
  • Country: au
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #29 on: August 09, 2024, 08:30:53 pm »
Those Ali parts are fakes.
 

Offline wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17401
  • Country: lv
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #30 on: August 09, 2024, 09:28:41 pm »
@fzabkar
Afaik, the C3320 has pin layout: 1(B) 2(C) 3(E)
The diode tests show:

BC
black on 1, red on 2 = OL
red on 1, black on 2= OL

CE
red on 2, black on 3 = OL
black on 2, red on 3 = 0.488V

BE
red on 1, black on 3 = OL
black on 1, red on 3 = OL
It's an N-channel MOSFET, what you're measuring between pins 2 and 3 is an intrinsic body diode. Tester detects is as a diode probably due to high gate-source threshold voltage.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2024, 09:33:20 pm by wraper »
 
The following users thanked this post: fzabkar

Offline htmTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 43
  • Country: nl
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #31 on: August 09, 2024, 10:09:14 pm »
@wraper
I tested it. Indeed!
The MOSFET is changing from Off to On from 4.1V to 5V.

But why didn't the Component tester see it as a MOSFET? aren't most mosfets switching in that area
« Last Edit: August 09, 2024, 10:51:38 pm by htm »
 

Offline wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17401
  • Country: lv
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #32 on: August 10, 2024, 10:56:39 am »
@wraper
I tested it. Indeed!
The MOSFET is changing from Off to On from 4.1V to 5V.

But why didn't the Component tester see it as a MOSFET? aren't most mosfets switching in that area
Most modern ones have lower VGS(TH). Your tester probably cannot supply enough voltage or measure above some value below it. Or maybe its firmware has some quirks. I wouldn't outright trust what such testers automatically detect.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2024, 11:00:47 am by wraper »
 
The following users thanked this post: htm

Offline htmTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 43
  • Country: nl
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors
« Reply #33 on: August 10, 2024, 12:57:20 pm »
Today i finished replacing the defective diodes and the 4 transistors.
On both boards 1 transistor seemed ok, but i replaced those as well, just in case. I rather have them all be the beefy BUV48A :D

Did a testrun of a minute, and..  :phew: :-+ 

Thanks for all advice!
« Last Edit: August 10, 2024, 03:04:15 pm by htm »
 

Offline htmTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 43
  • Country: nl
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors [fixed]
« Reply #34 on: August 14, 2024, 04:01:41 pm »
 :palm: .. he used it about 3 times, and then it quit on him again.

i'll take another look at it, to see if the same thing happened again.
 

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7299
  • Country: ca
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors [fixed > broken again]
« Reply #35 on: August 14, 2024, 08:43:22 pm »
Check your model is likely the same as a Vevor, for repair and safety issues as well. I also mentioned it here:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/repair/vevor-30l-ultrasonic-cleaner-went-up-in-smoke-take-tranducer-out-of-series/msg5605060/#new
 
The following users thanked this post: htm

Offline wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17401
  • Country: lv
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors [fixed > broken again]
« Reply #36 on: August 14, 2024, 10:05:10 pm »
As this has single layer PCBs I suggest thoroughly inspecting with magnification if there isn't some cracked solder joint. Sometimes it may be even not a crack as such but component lead not properly wetted by solder and moving within the joint that may look fine on a first glance.
 
The following users thanked this post: htm

Offline fzabkar

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2521
  • Country: au
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors [fixed > broken again]
« Reply #37 on: August 15, 2024, 12:08:12 am »
As this has single layer PCBs I suggest thoroughly inspecting with magnification if there isn't some cracked solder joint. Sometimes it may be even not a crack as such but component lead not properly wetted by solder and moving within the joint that may look fine on a first glance.

This is the reason that I was taught to always reflow the solder at inductors and transformers.
 

Offline wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17401
  • Country: lv
Re: ultrasonic cleaner MH-060S, replacing transistors [fixed > broken again]
« Reply #38 on: August 15, 2024, 03:43:03 pm »
As this has single layer PCBs I suggest thoroughly inspecting with magnification if there isn't some cracked solder joint. Sometimes it may be even not a crack as such but component lead not properly wetted by solder and moving within the joint that may look fine on a first glance.

This is the reason that I was taught to always reflow the solder at inductors and transformers.
FBT solder joints were basically guaranteed to crack sooner or later in CRT TVs/monitors if manufacturer did not add rivets in the holes. It also amazes me how often I see single layer boards used in high vibration environment, it's just plain stupid  :palm:.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2024, 03:44:36 pm by wraper »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf