Ok, to be upfront, this repair took a very different turn.
I never would have expected this.
The new current clamp arrived yesterday and today I wanted to take the time to trace through the existing and working new PCB in the new clamp.
So I open up the brand new i400 that looks the same as the old one from the outside.
And I am finding a very different PCB inside.
Actually the PCB in this new clamp is just a straight connection from the coil to the cable.
the few SMD pads are not even populated.
So, I just remove the old PCB from the old and broken clamp and hook up a new cable and guess what.... it works perfectly within specs.
Huh
What is going on?
Why such a relative complicated circuit if there is NO need for any circuit at all?
What was Fluke thinking?
It seems the SMD pads on the new PCB are for the placement of calibration resistors?
If so, why not having a few potentiometers instead of the pads?
This does not make much sense to me at all.
What do you all think went on here with Fluke?
Well, At the end I compared the two probes and they are working perfectly.
13.87 A compared to 13.73 A is about 1% difference.
I also tested at 25A and 50A with a few more loops through the clamp and it is just working perfectly.