In my anecdotal experience, the smaller the capacitor the higher the chance it fails and leaks. The earlier electrolytic SMD capacitors were particularly leaky, but I blame on the lower margins of error due to miniaturization: 1980s/90s laptops, personal organizers, calculators and other high density electronics all suffered this in one way or another.
The oldest equipments I have with electrolytic capacitors are a 1946 Philips radio and a Power Designs power supply (last cal was in 1969). While the radio has its main capacitor most probably dried up (due for a renovation), the power supply is still in top shape - the large GE "computer grade" capacitor is still performing very well. Other 1980s pieces of gear are still performing good such as a HP5300B/5308A, HP3312A, 3314A and a BK Precision 3300. On the other hand, all my older Flukes (8020A, 8060A, 8062A) had at least one or two tiny capacitors out of spec (although not leaked).
However, the size/leaky equation has been changing in the last decade or two with the popularity of switching converters/power supplies: the larger tank capacitors in the DC outputs tend to give up a lot faster due to the switching ripple - not to be confused with the high voltage tank capacitors of the primary voltage, which tend to have a long life. Also, the ambient temperature is a contributing factor: although the old vacuum tube circuits were bad, the solid state usually was well ventilated until you get to the high densities of plugpacks and miniaturized electronics.
A good LCR meter is key to evaluate all this - I highly recommend for anyone that does repairs.