Author Topic: Ugly twist to a programmable load  (Read 3097 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline joeqsmithTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11942
  • Country: us
Ugly twist to a programmable load
« on: May 03, 2015, 09:38:29 pm »
My voltage controlled current source based around a switching regulator. 


Offline Christopher

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 429
  • Country: gb
Re: Ugly twist to a programmable load
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2015, 10:23:33 pm »
Interesting to see your circuit.

Have you considered dumping the power into a battery or something?

At work we burn in power supplies and use loads which end up re powering the grid. Very nice compared to burning up 50kw in heat 24x7
 

Offline joeqsmithTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11942
  • Country: us
Re: Ugly twist to a programmable load
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2015, 02:01:27 am »
Interesting to see your circuit.

Have you considered dumping the power into a battery or something?

At work we burn in power supplies and use loads which end up re powering the grid. Very nice compared to burning up 50kw in heat 24x7
Glad you found it of interest. 

I had seen a post where a member had asked about using a switching load rather than linear and thought it may be interesting to play with.   It wasn't.   One thing that was mentioned was using a resistor to burn off the energy.   For this circuit, the majority of heat is going to be in the IGBT and FRED.  After that the inductor and 4-wire sense.

I had not considered doing anything with energy recovery.   There's a pretty big benefit if you can recover some of your 50KW.   This thing with that tiny heat sink is not going to handle any sort of power for any length of time.     The circuit has so many disadvantages anyway, it really was a pointless effort.    There was a post where someone mentioned feeding energy back  into the supply being tested.   I see no reason this could not be done.   

Offline Christopher

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 429
  • Country: gb
Re: Ugly twist to a programmable load
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2015, 05:34:08 am »
Yeah, no matter what you do you still loose power into a heatsink unless you are smart and recycle some of the power

Anyway, it's good in winter, makes for a good footwarmer
 

Offline Phoenix

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 436
  • Country: au
Re: Ugly twist to a programmable load
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2015, 07:17:22 am »
There was a post where someone mentioned feeding energy back  into the supply being tested.   I see no reason this could not be done.

This was actually a final year university project at my old research group (for a 3 phase inverter -> 3 phase active rectifier load), from the results I saw it worked pretty well. You would need to keep in mind common mode current paths and noise injection.

It also comes to mind that one good reason to create a switching version is to use it as a 4 quadrant (AC) load... but that requires a power supply on the load side capable of delivering energy and absorbing it.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2015, 01:15:01 pm by Phoenix »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf