Author Topic: TRIAC surprise  (Read 1169 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline S. PetrukhinTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1273
  • Country: ru
TRIAC surprise
« on: January 24, 2024, 02:14:28 pm »
Hi, friends!

I am trying to make a simple TRIAC control of a 3-phase load with reverse.
Shortened scheme:
1990159-0

There was a problem with the TRIAC opening spontaneously at the time of power on.
I know, but not very well, the vagaries of TRIAC in theory. But I can't figure out what the problem is.

At some time, a short circuit occurs when switching on. If it was possible to turn on without a short circuit, everything works steadily.

For verification, I have deattach cross triacs.
For direct TRIACs, the control pins are raised from the board and a locking resistor is connected to them only. There should be no interference with the control pin.
1990141-1

At the moment of switching on, there is some kind of transition process that gives a brief opening of the TRIAC.
The waveform one phase to neutral:
1990147-2

What could it be and how to deal with it? Please help me.

4 Quadrant Triac are used: https://datasheet.lcsc.com/lcsc/2105241606_KY-BT137S-800E_C2831693.pdf

Full schematic:
1990153-3 
And sorry for my English.
 

Offline KerimF

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 248
  • Country: sy
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2024, 04:46:53 pm »
Decreasing the resistance between G and T1 increases the triac limit of dv/dt though it increases the driving current which in turn increases the phase at which the triac is on (after zero crossing).

On your schematic, I read 620. If it means 620R (620 Ohm), it is relatively high (it has no significant effect).
The internal G-T1 is somehow like two reversed diodes connected in parallel (this can be checked using a multimeter).
So, the excess driving current for the 620R is 1/0.620 (assuming Vd=1) ~=1.6 mA only

A value of 33R (instead of 620R) may be needed here. The excess driving current for the 33R is 1/0.033 ~= 30mA. If the delayed phase is acceptable in your application, MOC can deliver this added triggering current.
For instance, the resistance, 620R, between a phase and MOC could also be reduced a bit if necessary (lower limit if 240Vrms is 450R with a margin around 25%).

One more point, here R8 is connected to U4 and U5. I personally prefer driving a MOC couple, as U4 & U5 for example on your schematic, by two separate resistors instead of one.

Hope this helps.

Kerim
A philosopher: A living thing has no choice but to execute its pre-programmed instructions embedded in it (known as instincts).
Therefore, the only freedom, a human may have, is his ability to oppose or not his natural robotic nature.
But, by opposing it, such a human becomes no more of this world.
 
The following users thanked this post: S. Petrukhin

Offline Doctorandus_P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3903
  • Country: nl
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2024, 06:06:20 pm »
Triac's have parasitic parts too.

A part of those is capacitive coupling between the gate, and the other terminals.

As a result, fast voltage transients over the other terminals can couple enough current into the gate to trigger the triac.

Common remedies are:
1. Use a less sensitive triac.
2. Add a snubber.
3. Use a "snubberless" triack (High dV/dt), low capacitive coupling).
4. Short the gate in an attempt to re-direct this current (I'm not sure if this works).
 
The following users thanked this post: S. Petrukhin

Offline S. PetrukhinTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1273
  • Country: ru
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2024, 09:05:21 am »
A value of 33R (instead of 620R) may be needed here.

Thanks for the help!
I'm radically reduced the locking resistor to 22 Ohms. The situation has improved, but, nevertheless, a short circuit sometimes occurs when switching on. Very rarely, but it appears.
Maybe I chose the wrong TRIAC for such purposes? I'm thinking of replacing it with the STM T1635-800G. Or use MOSFETs.  :)

One more point, here R8 is connected to U4 and U5. I personally prefer driving a MOC couple, as U4 & U5 for example on your schematic, by two separate resistors instead of one.
Hope this helps.
U4 and U5 will never turn on together, I think one resistor is enough for them.  :)
And sorry for my English.
 

Offline strawberry

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1199
  • Country: lv
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2024, 10:47:32 am »
back in the day ,I put 600..800V MKP10 capacitor across 240VAC . After week or so it went shorted.
input line filter or snubber could help maybe reduce fast/HF signals across triac or/and load
for 3 phase 240V systems usually use 1.2kV devices https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectifier ~560Vpk
 
The following users thanked this post: S. Petrukhin

Offline jonpaul

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3604
  • Country: fr
  • EE for 55 yrs
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2024, 10:50:06 am »
inductive load transients and arcs in load

Use a properly rated snubber.

I would start with 5..10 nF 1000V VDE X in series with flameproof 100 Ohm across the triacs

j
The Internet Dinosaur
 
The following users thanked this post: S. Petrukhin

Offline Kean

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2327
  • Country: au
  • Embedded systems & IT consultant
    • Kean Electronics
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2024, 02:16:38 pm »
Yep, add a snubber across each triac.  For guidance, see ST Micro AN437 or Onsemi AN1048/D.
 
The following users thanked this post: S. Petrukhin

Offline S. PetrukhinTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1273
  • Country: ru
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2024, 02:37:29 pm »
Yep, add a snubber across each triac.  For guidance, see ST Micro AN437 or Onsemi AN1048/D.

An interesting circuit design in an1048-d.pdf (see arrows)  :clap:
1992727-0
And sorry for my English.
 

Offline Kean

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2327
  • Country: au
  • Embedded systems & IT consultant
    • Kean Electronics
Re: TRIAC surprise
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2024, 04:57:25 pm »
An interesting circuit design in an1048-d.pdf (see arrows)  :clap:

Interesting!
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf