Author Topic: Texas Instruments notation question  (Read 1660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BurnedResistorTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • Country: at
Texas Instruments notation question
« on: November 18, 2016, 09:29:59 am »
Dear All,

I am working on designing an amplifier to alllow for the scaling in the for of y = mx-b, and found a TI reference manual:s"
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa030a/sloa030a.pdf

However, in the appropriate section, on pg12 the book uses a notation that I have never seen before in Analog design: R1 || R2

I am guessing that this is not a logical bitwise operation?

I was not able to find out what this notation meant :/ Anyone got any ideas?

 

Offline BurnedResistorTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • Country: at
Re: Texas Instruments notation question
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2016, 09:32:18 am »
Similarly they state

R1 || R2 << Rg

Again i really dont think the << is a bitwise shift. Anyone know?
 

Online Phoenix

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 435
  • Country: au
Re: Texas Instruments notation question
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2016, 09:40:12 am »
|| means in parallel
<< significantly less than (orders of magnitude)
>> significantly greater than (orders of magnitude)
 
The following users thanked this post: BurnedResistor

Offline BurnedResistorTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • Country: at
Re: Texas Instruments notation question
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2016, 10:02:21 am »
Oh wow thats pretty neat!

In other words, R1 || R2 << R3

R1 and R2 in parrallell are 2 orders of magnitude smaller than R3?

 

Offline dmills

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
  • Country: gb
Re: Texas Instruments notation question
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2016, 10:19:16 am »
I don't think << necessarily means TWO orders of magnitude so much as the less precise "LHS Much smaller then", how much smaller depends on how close you need the approximation to be.

It could be 1, 2,or 3 orders, but is it uncritical as long as R3 is a lot bigger.

I would note that there may be other constraints, so don't get silly, output drive, input bias current, thermal noise.... But the simplification in the maths works as long as R3 is much bigger then R1 || R2.

73 Dan.
 
The following users thanked this post: BurnedResistor


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf