Author Topic: should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?  (Read 890 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ammjyTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 160
  • Country: kr
should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?
« on: March 03, 2018, 10:44:49 am »
Hello !
this is my previous question link.
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/make-transfer-function-for-rc-servo-is-not-possible/)

Please, see the picture what i added in this post ! (Thanks you very much !! )

first, Thanks you for click.

now, for make step response of my RC servo motor, i catched voltage move with single shot trigger.

graph showing information.
1.5ms(1.540V) to 1ms(1.040V).

but, graph is quite dirty. for get more clean graph, should i add some capacitor ?
« Last Edit: March 03, 2018, 10:46:59 am by ammjy »
 

Offline danadak

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1875
  • Country: us
  • Reactor Operator SSN-583, Retired EE
Re: should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2018, 11:10:45 am »
The noise looks like a small ceramic disk, say .01uF or .1uF might help.

Larger caps will affect your goal to get to transfer function as the cap
will contribute to system dynamic behavior as its an energy storage
element.

An alternative way is, if scope is DSO, and has ability to export capture
data to post process it in excel or MatLab. With a LPF or running average
filter.

Or use DSO to average several step response cycles....

Regards, Dana.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2018, 11:13:34 am by danadak »
Love Cypress PSOC, ATTiny, Bit Slice, OpAmps, Oscilloscopes, and Analog Gurus like Pease, Miller, Widlar, Dobkin, obsessed with being an engineer
 

Offline ammjyTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 160
  • Country: kr
Re: should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2018, 11:24:10 am »
Thabks you a lot, Mr. Danadak !

i fully understanded !

Thanks you again !
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16918
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2018, 12:40:05 pm »
The servo itself low pass filters the output from the potentiometer to prevent chatter.  I would add a resistor in series with the wiper and then a capacitor to ground.  Servos are very slow so the time constant of the filter can be large.
 

Offline ammjyTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 160
  • Country: kr
Re: should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2018, 04:54:59 pm »
Thanks you for reply, David Hess !

aa yes i understanded your point !

 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16918
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: should i add capacitor for measure response with scope ?
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2018, 07:07:28 pm »
Long ago I remember assembling Heathkit servos literally from kits and they included a schematic and description:

http://vintagercfiles.com/Files/Heathkit/Servos/GDA-1205-8%20servo/Heathkit%20GDA-1205-8%20servo.pdf

These are pulse width modulated servos, which were a great improvement over the analog servos preceding them, so they do not work in the way you might expect by comparing the output of the potentiometer to a voltage level.  Instead, the potentiometer controls the charging of a capacitor producing a ramp yielding a pulse width which is compared to the pulse width of the control signal; either it is later or earlier.  But the result of this is that the potentiometer position is *integrated* instead of sampled so it has an automatic low pass filter function applied removing wiper noise.

I could not find the details on the weird 12 pin integrated circuit Heathkit used but I suspect the potentiometer and capacitor pulse width circuit actually produces a linear ramp similar to how the sweep generator on an oscilloscope works.

The application circuit for the On Semiconductor MC33030 analog servo controller shows capacitor filtering on the feedback and input signal.

https://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MC33030-D.PDF
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf