I think it's proven group collaboration on forums such as this don't do well and rarely finish something when the project is poorly defined, or there is no leadership on the project.
The requirements have to be complete enough and nailed down, and that was not clear here so the solutions were all over the place but it was a good discussion
Forum format is not much different than the 1980's BBS, a long thread of opinions with free and paid experts, noobs and trolls mashed together to try hammer something out among the flames.
You can start a new thread with "solid-state" added to the title but OP is the one to ultimately build and finish it- as they initiated the thread.
Commanding to be given a finished design and bill-of-materials, as some do - sorry but you'll actually have to do some work. Or instead, purchase the product you need.
Many here know how to make a solution, but community member's time, money, and energy to build and test... compared to spew out some text in a post, there are limits and no real incentive to design and build for free.
I think the forum format needs to evolve to successfully build things, it hasn't really been found on the Internet the best way to crowd source something.
So many open source "let's build X" threads that die and fizzle out. This all should be another discussion, a thread somewhere else.