Author Topic: CFL powered off DC  (Read 11011 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
CFL powered off DC
« on: April 05, 2013, 06:27:32 am »
I've been toying with ideas for lighting my firewood shed prior to winter setting in.  I live in a semi rural area that backs onto bush, which inevitably means we get every creature under the sun living in our wood pile.  Makes collecting a barrow load of wood in the dark an "interesting" experience at times.

It's close enough to the house to make running cable out to it ok, however it's far enough to make putting a mains connection down there very expensive.  I want to run some garden lights out in the general area as well, so I figure running it off DC (maybe 48V?) would be a sensible solution.

I've played around with some LED solutions but have generally been underwhelmed (need plenty of diffused light to see the large eight legged friends as they run up your arms.)

Someone posted a tear down of a CFL the other day, and it looks like they've all got a rectifier/cap arrangement on the input.  So I thought what the hell, why not just build a DC-DC converter at the shed end and step up the voltage to 340VDC (240VACrms * SQRT(2)).

So I tried it out on the bench by modding an old hack of a DC-DC converter I had from building car amps and all seems to work just fine.  Although power consumption was about 15% higher than what the globe was rated at.  Its rated at 20W, and draws 66mA after warming up.  With 340V, that makes about 22.5W.  Should I be lowering the voltage?  Or is the rating actually the power making its way to the tube and not overall rated consumption?

So it seems like a good idea, and designing the converter wont be too hard.  But is there anything to do with these CFLs that I'm not taking into account?  I really don't know a hell of a lot about them.
 

Offline BravoV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7549
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2013, 06:33:20 am »
Did you wind both transformers (middle and toroid) yourself ?

Post the circuit please.

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2013, 06:51:12 am »
Did you wind both transformers (middle and toroid) yourself ?

Post the circuit please.

Yeah I've wound many.  Actually these ones are quick hacks that I'm not proud of by any means.  Attached is a much nicer example of one I wound on the epcos ETD29 core.

I don't have the files for it anymore (this was the first car amp psu I built around 4yrs ago and has been hacked for many applications over the years.)  However it's a simple 12V unregulated push-pull converter using a TL494 and separate mosfet driver. I'll post the schematics of the finished PSU for this application once I've done it.
 

Offline BravoV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7549
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2013, 09:15:42 am »
Tidy windings, nice, is that a litz wire ?

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2013, 09:49:23 am »
Tidy windings, nice, is that a litz wire ?

Nope, just measured out the two lengths, tied them together at one end to something solid, then put the other end in a drill.  Then simply wind until you get the turns/inch you're after.
 

Offline BravoV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7549
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2013, 09:57:23 am »
Then simply wind until you get the turns/inch you're after.

Turns/inch ? Is that matter ? I mean for the overall transformer's performance ? Noob quesiton here.

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2013, 10:08:02 am »
Not as far as I know. But I like to be consistent with the same gauge of wire so that multiple windings on the transformer (and across multiple transformers) look the same. Obviously with heavy gauge wires you don't want to over wind them and weaken the insulation.
 

Offline amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8420
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2013, 11:38:10 am »
Have you tried it with more than one CFL? The circuits in them are very cheaply made and component tolerances aren't going to be perfect. I wouldn't be surprised if another draws only 18 or 19W.
 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10239
  • Country: nz
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2013, 11:51:38 am »
The local hardware store here stocks 12V (and i think 24V)  DC CFL lamps.

They look identical to the 240V versions in terms of their socket, size and shape. (But have different drivers inside obviously.)

We're using them in the garage.
I ran a 13.8V 20A power feed to the garage using 7 AWG overhead cable to drive all the lighting and battery charger.

Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2013, 12:09:33 pm »
The local hardware store here stocks 12V (and i think 24V)  DC CFL lamps.

They look identical to the 240V versions in terms of their socket, size and shape. (But have different drivers inside obviously.)

We're using them in the garage.
I ran a 13.8V 20A power feed to the garage using 7 AWG overhead cable to drive all the lighting and battery charger.

Yeah they use to, and I do have a couple from that time that I'm going to use somewhere else.  But, they don't anymore, and even when they did it was only one brand in cold white and relatively expensive (not that I care that much about a few dollars.)  Sure you can still get hold of them from an online retailer, but I like the idea of having a system where you can just use any of the cheap off the shelf items you can get from anywhere.

I guess more so is it won't be difficult to design the DC-DC converter, then I can use that design in a number of places around the yard (gate lights etc.)
 

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2013, 12:14:12 pm »
Have you tried it with more than one CFL? The circuits in them are very cheaply made and component tolerances aren't going to be perfect. I wouldn't be surprised if another draws only 18 or 19W.

That's a good point, I only tried one.  I don't have it set up anymore to try others.  I'll just keep the design a 340V and see how it goes.  15% over isn't that much anyway (if it only lasts for 10yrs instead of the advertised 15... who cares.)
 

Offline Alana

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 297
  • Country: pl
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2013, 12:24:58 pm »
What is the problem with 240V AC in the shed? Even if permanent wiring need to be done by licensed electrician i think you could power it from wall outlet as if it was long extension cord.
 

Offline C

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1346
  • Country: us
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2013, 06:23:38 pm »

Is there some rule or law that says you can not do some or most of the work?

Here 240V AC is three wires, where you are it could be two wires.
For an extension like this the safety ground should be kept separate, so add a wire to above.

Remember, As you decrease the voltage for the same power, the wire size has to increase and increase some more to cover the voltage loss. This increases costs.

If you are putting wire in the ground, you should use wire built for this purpose.
Be aware, Your creature's like to chew on wires even if under ground.

If memory serves, here Power wires in the ground should be a min 18 inches down.

If I were doing this I would add some control wires so I could turn off/on separate circuits remotely . For most rules the control wires need to be separated from the AC power wire by ____ distance. If you are creating a trench for power wires this is easy to do and cheap to add some control wires. I would do control wires rated Cat5 or better.

Plastic pipe: Makes it easer to change out wires or add wires with out digging. But remember the creature problem, If the creature chews a hole in the top of pipe, the pipe could fill with water.

If you have to use a  licensed electrician, Ask what parts you could do to save money.

If you get an answer like some in this area have from a plumber
Plumber: " I will charge you $5000 to run the sewer pipe and connect it to the sewer system"
Question to plummer: " and if I install the pipe?"
Plumber: "I will charge you $5000 to connect to the sewer system!"
You will know you are fighting a government sponsored Racket.

C

 

Offline smashedProton

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 641
  • Country: us
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2013, 07:16:03 pm »
Cant you just use a couple step up transformers to provide a HV bridge between the two points?  You could then get away with using tiny wires.  It also may provide some protection from the critters to some degree.   :-DD
http://www.garrettbaldwin.com/

Invention, my dear friends, is 93% perspiration, 6% electricity, 4% evaporation, and 2% butterscotch ripple.
 

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2013, 01:35:12 am »

Is there some rule or law that says you can not do some or most of the work?

It depends on the electrician you get.  At the end of the day, they have to sign off on it, and if they don't want to they just wont do the job.  But, yes, it's a possibility.

Quote
Here 240V AC is three wires, where you are it could be two wires.
For an extension like this the safety ground should be kept separate, so add a wire to above.
Yep it's two wire + ground.

[/quote]
Remember, As you decrease the voltage for the same power, the wire size has to increase and increase some more to cover the voltage loss. This increases costs.
[/quote]
In this case it won't make any difference to the cable to be run.  The minimum requirements for mains cabling means it'll need the standard conductor size (which can handle a 10-15A circuit IIRC.)  At 48VDC, 100W of lighting will only be 2A, so no big deal.

Quote
If you are putting wire in the ground, you should use wire built for this purpose.
Be aware, Your creature's like to chew on wires even if under ground.

If memory serves, here Power wires in the ground should be a min 18 inches down.

If I were doing this I would add some control wires so I could turn off/on separate circuits remotely . For most rules the control wires need to be separated from the AC power wire by ____ distance. If you are creating a trench for power wires this is easy to do and cheap to add some control wires. I would do control wires rated Cat5 or better.

Plastic pipe: Makes it easer to change out wires or add wires with out digging. But remember the creature problem, If the creature chews a hole in the top of pipe, the pipe could fill with water.

Yep, either way conduit for buried wires is cheap (I was looking at it yesterday, $6 for a 4 meter length) so it'll be a trench with buried conduit and wires feed through it.

I'll defiantly be putting down control wires.

Quote
If you have to use a  licensed electrician, Ask what parts you could do to save money.

If you get an answer like some in this area have from a plumber
Plumber: " I will charge you $5000 to run the sewer pipe and connect it to the sewer system"
Question to plummer: " and if I install the pipe?"
Plumber: "I will charge you $5000 to connect to the sewer system!"
You will know you are fighting a government sponsored Racket.

C

BTW when I've said creatures, we actually have very few that chew on things.  We have plenty of Oz native mammals, but they're quite different from mice and rats that cities have to deal with.  They just go about their business digging smalls holes in the ground and are very shy of humans.

Certainly putting a mains connection down to the shed is still a possibility, but there's going to be a DC link anyway for garden lighting, so I'll start out with that and see how it goes.
 

Offline C

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1346
  • Country: us
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #15 on: April 06, 2013, 02:38:45 am »

Check your rules.

here you can normally run power under 50 volts next to controls.
Some places you could use long coils of pipe like they use for water, but if unsure us the electrical conduit.
if you put in a proper electrical conduit you might find an electrician to finish it. If you do this leave part or all the trench open so the electrician can see it.

You may not know this trick, tie a strong string to a part of a soft paper towel. Then use air pressure to blow the paper towel the length of the pipe. You now have a pull string use to pull something stronger or the wire through the conduit.

A conduit in the ground with a ready pull cord could make a big difference.

Good luck

C
 

Offline HackedFridgeMagnet

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2035
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #16 on: April 06, 2013, 03:27:07 am »
Although most of what you C says is true, Harvs cant do the mains wiring without a licence. It is quite strict in Aus.
But if the wiring is considered Separate Extra Low Voltage then AS3000 doesn't apply.
ELV is defined in AS/NZS 3000 Wiring Rules as "Not exceeding 50 V a.c or 120 V ripple-free d.c."
I reckon you could do some good things with 120v dc.

Even though I have my sparkies licence I entirely agree that
Quote
You will know you are fighting a government sponsored Racket.



One the subject of rats and native critters, here are two I caught yesterday. The one with the long tail is no longer with us.


 

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2013, 03:59:34 am »
Although most of what you C says is true, Harvs cant do the mains wiring without a licence. It is quite strict in Aus.
But if the wiring is considered Separate Extra Low Voltage then AS3000 doesn't apply.
ELV is defined in AS/NZS 3000 Wiring Rules as "Not exceeding 50 V a.c or 120 V ripple-free d.c."
I reckon you could do some good things with 120v dc.

Even though I have my sparkies licence I entirely agree that
Quote
You will know you are fighting a government sponsored Racket.

One the subject of rats and native critters, here are two I caught yesterday. The one with the long tail is no longer with us.

Nice rodents. Long tail = imported.

I didn't realize the rules allowed as high as 120VDC.  I only knew about the 50V rule (hence the plan to use 48VDC.)  120VDC would be nice...  But then again, 48V offline supplies are available everywhere, I think I'd struggle to find a suitable 100+VDC offline supply without resorting to custom building my own.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16366
  • Country: za
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2013, 05:35:25 am »
If going to mains cabling put a big enough cable in. Not much difference in the price for a 20A breaker and a 40A breaker. If going for buried cable you can go with conduit and pull ordinary house wire through ( 3 cores) or use a steel wire armoured cable and not bother with conduit. I use  conduit a lot with aerial bundle cable in it ( legal here to bury it in conduit) and it worked out a lot cheaper than the armoured cable. This will give a 6mm or 10mm cable, enough to allow you to have a 30 or 50A circuit board in the shed. This allows you to run high powered tools there easily.
 

Offline peter.mitchell

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1567
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2013, 07:03:38 am »
Electrical conduit is pretty cheap, get bigger stuff, so its easier to pull stuff through and you can add more stuff to it later on, and when you use your pull rope, have 2 on hand, so when you pull your cable through, you can pull a new pull rope through at the same time.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16366
  • Country: za
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2013, 12:28:47 pm »
My preferred conduit for multiple cables is 50mm drain piping. If you are going to have power and data cabling then place 2 pipe runs in the trench, at opposite sides if possible, so there is some separation between them. If doing a whole bundle of data cabling nothing is better than 110 PVC sewage piping, you can blow the cable through then.
 

Offline peter.mitchell

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1567
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2013, 06:55:06 pm »
Oh, also, for underground conduit, glue it together, above ground its fine not to, but under, you're just asking for water.
 

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #22 on: April 07, 2013, 01:40:19 am »
My preferred conduit for multiple cables is 50mm drain piping. If you are going to have power and data cabling then place 2 pipe runs in the trench, at opposite sides if possible, so there is some separation between them. If doing a whole bundle of data cabling nothing is better than 110 PVC sewage piping, you can blow the cable through then.

Wow, that's some serious data cabling you're doing! (assuming you mean the 110mm ID pipe.)  How many CAT5/6 cables do you put through that?
 

Offline Colin55

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 20
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #23 on: April 07, 2013, 02:06:12 am »
Run a lead to the shed.  You can run a lead to anywhere.

Driving a CFL is very difficult.   Use a 15watt fluoro tube. It is much easier to drive.
 

Offline HarvsTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: au
Re: CFL powered off DC
« Reply #24 on: April 07, 2013, 03:44:20 am »
Driving a CFL is very difficult.   Use a 15watt fluoro tube. It is much easier to drive.

How so?  Playing with them on the bench they seem easy as pie.  Just give them 340VDC and they seem happy.

Why is a 15W fluoro any different?  Don't they basically use the same circuitry but the CFLs just integrate it into the one object?

I'm genuinely interested, as I've said at the start, I really don't know a hell of a lot about them.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf