I'm not sure why you would be surprised that I am assembling this cal kit for use at frequencies beyond a GHz.
LOL no. I am not suprised at all. Initially you compared ANNE plugs in 0..6GHz range. Then after I mentioned NanoVNA load standard to ANNE comparison, for some "strange reason" you omitted 0..1GHz (of NanoVNA range) and picked 1..6GHz. Could be accident could be not. Anyway you did not manage to disprove my point - that ANNE plug is better than supplied NanoVNA load. Also please let others decide - 11$ for terminator (as load standard) which at least have datasheet figures is waste or not. Unless you show comparison in 0..6GHz range, I have nothing else to discuss with you.
Sorry that the data I had collected for my one Nano terminator doesn't meet your needs. I didn't run that test for you but out of my own curiosity. I know you feel the world evolves around you and you are entitled to my time but I assure you, it's not the case. I collected that data a few months back and when you asked, I took the time to post what I had.
There are no published spec's for the Nano's terminator. Each will be different (even if they were supplied by the same manufacture). However, we do have spec's for the ANNE which is 30dB return loss in the range the Nano is capable of being used. It's obvious that a person would need to measure them both if they want to know what the effects are. It's not a feeling or please let others decide but a simple fact. I can understand you not like being called out and it hurts your feelings and you feel its a personal attack and I should just agree with you. All of that has nothing to do with misrepresenting the data, especially when you start misleading the public.
In singles, the ANNE will cost $15 or more. You need to consider sales tax and shipping. I imagine I could hand select a couple of 0805 100 ohm parts for the frequency range of the Nano, if it were a concern. History has shown I can't do this once I get much above a GHz and it requires a commercial part.
The cost of the Agilent cal kits exceed what I would be willing to pay. I am not interested in used parts that some clueless person has damaged. Making the shorts and opens were not a simple task and required several attempts at machining parts. From the data I've shown using rf-messkopf's script and Agilent's standards, the results are reasonable. The loads are really the problem and it seems the least costly approach was to buy several and sort them.
Consider they all met the manufacture's spec and can't be returned as defective. I ran 6pcs. At 11 + 0.66(tax) and say $8 in shipping, about $78. #3 also looks pretty decent. For my home hobby, good enough.