Right, a DE0 nano is better, if you are just starting with FPGAs, and knowing both, I think the Altera software is easier to use than the Xilinx software.
I needed a few days to learn the Xilinx toolchain and to write a simple entity, but I knew already the Altera NIOS toolchain and the concepts how these FPGA SoC systems work and how your own HDL entity is integrated, which is similar in both systems, just the GUI is completely different, and I know VHDL. Then there is the Linux side, but I've done Linux driver development for a professional project for some years, so this was easy. If you learn this all from scratch, including VHDL or Verilog, you might need a few weeks until you see your first Linux controlled blinking LED with your own HDL code. With a DE0 nano you can do this in a day (without Linux).
Using the Epiphany chip is much easier. Adapteva provides an Eclipse IDE and pre-compiled toolchain for it, and you can program it in C. There are tutorials and cool examples on the forum how to use it. No need for FPGA programming or toolchain juggling, if you just want to use this chip.