Here follows a crude schematic of the reference.
Two identical references whose outputs are averaged to reduce noise. Each LTZ1000 reference section is built almost exactly as prescribed in the LTZ1000 data sheet. Both LTZ1000’s are properly raised a millimeter above the PCB. Nice attention to details!
70K resistors are made up of 50K in series with 20K, both 0.01% Vishay resistors. The "120 ohm" resistor is two 0.01% 250 Ohm Vishay resistors in parallel resulting in 125 ohm which is the only deviation from the LTZ1000 reference circuit in the datasheet, I have found.
The important temperature set point resistors 13K/1K resistor pair is interestingly an ordinary 13K/1% resistor that is marked with a small number as if it was selected. The 1K resistor is a Vishay Mill specified 50 ppm resistor marked RV60C1001B. Question is if this pair is TCR matched as it should be. Otherwise there is room for improvement.
Lowering the operation temperature could also be considered.
The presence of a low noise high stability reference in this unit indicates that the rest of the hardware actually can benefit from not only a single LTZ1000 reference but two with reduced noise. This comes as a surprise as the noise specs for the LM399 based 2701C isn’t all that great as I recall.
But this is of cause wideband noise that tends to be averaged during DMM calibration. The dual LTZ1000 reference will probably greatly reduce noise below 10 Hz compared to a single LM399 which is of great importance when used as a DMM calibrator or voltage transfer standard.
With respect to stability it’s interesting if the PWM based voltage generation now becomes the weak link. The crystal might be an ordinary 30 ppm type. Absolute precision is unimportant but most ordinary fork type crystals have temperature coefficients of about -0.05 ppm/C. Aging is often better that 3ppm/year. However, Valhalla could have selected a crystal with much better specs in the model. Would an OCXO be a worthy upgrade? Maybe.