SIGLENT SDG1025 FAIL

[ekrzychoooo]

Hello
The SIGLENT SDG1025 generates poor performance when changing frequencies.
Please watch this movie and write what you think.

Are your generators other than SIGLENT eg RIGOL having the same problem?
The information has already been sent to SIGLENT.
Now I'm waiting for an answer.

Regards
Christopher.

[Rbastler]

I never had such issues on my SDG1025. If it's a thing, mine has to go anyway, because I want one with lan.
I don't have acess to it, but I will look into the problem onve I have.

[Muxr]

I haven't experienced this with my SDG1025 but I can try to reproduce it tonight. I do remember updating firmware on mine when I first bought it because it had some bugs, but I can't remember what those bugs were of the top of my head.

[ekrzychoooo]

Here is the next movie.

Switch to text, in English
https://youtu.be/ulQ1FglQGPY

[nctnico]

This is normal behaviour for many (if not all) digital function generators. If you need defined behaviour then use the burst function combined with a trigger.

[Rbastler]

What firmware version do you use ?

[ekrzychoooo]

I use 1.01.01.39R2

[ekrzychoooo]

This is normal behaviour for many (if not all) digital function generators. If you need defined behaviour then use the burst function combined with a trigger.

It is not normal. In RIGOL generators everything is OK

I use class C++

Code: [Select]

pseudocode
for(f=Fstart; f<Fend; f += delta){
    set_SDG1025(f);
    Sleep(100ms);
    measurement();
}

I need eg 500 samples.
Function measurement(); Shows nonsense.

[xrunner]

Are your generators other than SIGLENT eg RIGOL having the same problem?

No.

(Rigol DG1032Z here)

[ekrzychoooo]

SDG1032X :

source:http://www.elektroda.pl/rtvforum/viewtopic.php?p=16584532#16584532

[tautech]

I think you must use the Sweep function to side step the frequency change glitch.