Yet the only actual data you presented is in disagreement with this.
It's not, but I'm sure you'll tell me that it is (hopefully, also "how" it is, or "why"). If you could make that less of a "teaching down at you" moment, that'll drive your point a little better, and I mean this both respectfully and hopefully (if you're a tenth as prominent in what you do, as you seem to be, you'd know this. I am in what I do, and I do know it). It's a disservice to your knowledge to have this demeanor.
But I haven't seen that this far (with all of your generous posting with resources, articles, and links, etc., which I appreciate every single one of), nor have I seen a close read of what I'm posting here. You're glazing over my discrete data or qualitative points concerning hours of observations I've made (none of which I can really substantiate, as they're "qualitative," and you'd just have to trust me that what I'm saying is the result of hundreds of hours hard work of "memorized" data accrual) to drive points you want to make regardless of any of it. That, in particular, is not helpful. It's disrespectful of my work.
The ball is in your court, and I'm hopeful.