Aussie Cal Club - the story so far...
TiN puts up a compelling argument, so here goes. I initially started this thread because I had just purchased my first true DMM, an out-of-cal HP3456A 6.5 digit.
Even though it is a monster in size, and takes up a disproportionate amount of my very limited desk space, I have become quite attached to it.
After some minor repairs, with the help of EEVblog Forum members, I needed (wanted) to find out how accurate this old meter was (first bite of the voltnut bug). My initial idea was to band together with 10 other like-minded souls and fund the professional calibration of the best meter in the group (hopefully a HP3458A) and use that to calibrate all the other member's meters. Well, this idea quickly died but what did come out of this was an interest in sharing home made and professional standards.
The practicalities of international shipping were discussed but I wanted to start out with a local club first to see how it would work (I see there is now a USA Cal Club starting up).
We started with 4 Australian members (now up to 7 Aussies), mostly junior voltnuts with 1 senior nut. Only two members had in-cal meters, 6.5d and 7.5d. All had the same question "How accurate is my gear?".
We started out by each member sending his Refs to a nominated member so that all Refs could be measured at the same time and place. All data was informal in the sense that we did not have a set of instructions on how to go about it. Also, conditions, mainly temperature and humidity, were not constant. Our members are scattered across the country and summer here can get quite hot and humid.
We discovered the importance of equipment and reference warm-up times, the effect of ambient temperature and air currents, effects of nearby electronic equipment, single measurements vs statistical averaging, etc.
Despite the difficulty in navigating through this minefield, we did end up with some valuable data for Stage #1.
More to come
enut11
Aussie Cal Club Continued...
A number of interested Australians connected via this thread:
Members Meters:
Tek 7510 (7.5d DMM, in cal)
3 Keysight 34461A (6.5d DMM, in cal)
HP3458A (8.5d DMM, out of cal)
HP3457A (6.5d DMM, out of cal)
HP3456A (6.5d DMM, out of cal)
HP34401A (6.5d DMM, out of cal)
Keithley 2015 (6.5d DMM, out of cal)
Keithley 2700 (6.5d DMM, out of cal)
2 Keithley 196 (6.5d DMM, out of cal)
Members References:
DMM Check+ multi ref
AD588 10v
AD587 10v
LT1236ACN8-10 — 10V ± 0.05%, 2ppm/ºC
MAX6350CPA+ — 5V ± 0.02%, 0.5ppm/ºC
LT1019ACN8-2.5 — 2.5V ± 0.05%, 3ppm/ºC
Y145310K0000V9L — 10k? ± 0.005%, 0.2ppm/ºC
Y07851K00000T9L — 1k? ± 0.01%, 2ppm/ºC
LM399 C3 (unboxed)
Calibratory 10.000000 VDC ±0.0002% (±2ppm)
Resistors
Vishay Metal Foil
Foil Resistor 100K
Foil Resistor 10K
Foil Resistor 1K
Foil Resistor 100 Ohm
Foil Resistor 1K14 Ohm
All the above Refs were sent to one member who set about measuring them under the same conditions. Initial temp and humidity were noted and all results were recorded in a spreadsheet. Some were simple 1-off readings after equipment and refs were allowed to stabilise, often up 24 hrs. Those who could took advantage of statistical averaging.
All Refs were then shipped in bulk to the next member who repeated the process. As this was our first attempt we made a few errors, mainly in environmental management. It was summer time in Australia and coastal towns can get hot and humid. Most members did not have a temperature controlled workshop and we all know temp is king when it comes to high resolution voltage measurements. Also, EMF radiation (fluro lights, computers, etc) proved a challenge for those chasing more than 7 digits!
Despite all the problems we ended up with a set of very consistent results. Members with out-of-cal equipment were able to see how their DMM compared with the calibrated units.
Some of us have already started to build better refs to play with. Initially LM399s and now LTZ1000s, all inspired by the Metrology section of the EEVblog Forum. These new refs are in soak mode to attempt to stabilise the output. We are also looking at rationalising our methods of measurement to improve uncertainty.
The journey continues...
enut11
PS
We have just had two new members join recently and are now 7 strong.