@Doctorandus_P: Don't get your panties in a bunch. If you "do not find this topic very interesting" then you know what to do. If I look silly to you then so be it.
Surely we can agree that removing any cross sectional area from a solid cylinder will affect its tensile strength. Such change is easily calculable from the degree of reduction of csa and the material's properties and treatment.From their website, it does indeed have a narrower pin than the indicator head As CatalinaWOW says. I'm sure the manufactures do have a good handle on this.
I have zero intention of using them either, but certain aspects of their design and manufacture still intrigue me. Things like how the bottom of the center rod is attached, presumably by something like capacitor welding (or is it held down by a belleville spring in the head?). Looking at the 'How it works' section on the website the pin only extends down a small proportion of the bolt shaft, presumably this is sufficient to assess the full length, although it won't specifically detect anomalies issues occurring nearer the end due to mating thread anomalies. Also the details of calibrating each bolt in mass production, presumably the pin attachment has some variability even if the pins start at a precise length. It implies some elongation testing when mounting the windows. The inability to indicate that a bolt is over torqued, or is stretching in use rather than loosening (I think I would prefer something where the correct stretch is indicated by dark red rather than black). It's perfectly fine to be curious about such things without any intention of using them.