Frankly you should be the last person saying this, because you are bashing every other scope other than Rigol in non Rigol treads. Or bringing other manufacturers in treads about Rigol issues and derailing them in this way.
Really? Examples please.
No don't bother. I already know what you're thinking. It's true I did mention "Rigol" in
both of the threads about Keysight failures - but only to point out that people like you were defending Keysight where you'd be attacking Rigol. Outside of those two threads? Not a chance. Why on earth would I go into a thread about more expensive scopes and say anything about Rigol. I freely admit that more expensive scopes
are better - why wouldn't they be?
But somehow you want that included as standard in a $400 oscilloscope?
Hopefully this tread won't be derailed but GW instek somehow offers 1 million point FFT in their <$400 GDS-1054B. Which is proven to work very well. And after the firmware update, it became much easier to use than on Daves's video where he admits it works well but don't like clunky control.
Sure, but the $400 GW-Instek is only 50Mhz, no serial decoders, less memory... it loses out to the Rigol on other ways.
Besides, not everybody is obsessed by FFTs. The fact that the DS1054Z's FFT is a weak point doesn't mean that people shouldn't buy them