Author Topic: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)  (Read 2300 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheUnnamedNewbieTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1211
  • Country: 00
  • mmwave RFIC/antenna designer
Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« on: November 26, 2017, 11:40:12 am »
So, I asked a while ago about a keithley 2k vs some other meters. As a result of that post I decided to get myself a keithley 2000. When I was looking on ebay, I spotted a seller offering a 2015 for just a fraction more than any of the 2000s that were offered (at least the ones that looked like they were in ok condition), and the seller was in germany, which meant much cheaper shipping. I was now wondering if there was any reason I should still go for the 2000 instead of the 2015. From what I can tell, the 2015 is just a 2000 with some extra functionality slapped on. Is this really the case, or does it have different measurement capabilities? I already looked through the manual and couldn't immediately see something.
The best part about magic is when it stops being magic and becomes science instead

"There was no road, but the people walked on it, and the road came to be, and the people followed it, for the road took the path of least resistance"
 

Offline capt bullshot

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3033
  • Country: de
    • Mostly useless stuff, but nice to have: wunderkis.de
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2017, 12:45:38 pm »
Yes, the 2015 is a 2000 with the additional THD capabilities. I've got one, and I didn't find any drawbacks.
Safety devices hinder evolution
 

Offline saturnin

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Country: cz
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2017, 01:06:05 pm »
K2000 has somewhat better specs for 10 MOhm and 100 MOhm ranges:

±(ppm of reading + ppm of range), 1 year
10 MOhm: 400 + 10
100 MOhm: 1500 + 30

vs. K2015:

±(ppm of reading + ppm of range), 1 year
10 MOhm: 600 + 10
100 MOhm: 2200 + 30

This is the only difference in specs I've noticed.

Btw. Keithley (Tektronix) released new version of K2015 datasheet where they warn about availability of K2015 in EU:

This product is not updated to comply with the RoHS2 Directive 2011/65/EU and will not be shipped to the EU. Customers may be able to purchase products from inventory that were placed on the EU market prior to July 22, 2017 until supplies are depleted.

https://www.tek.com/datasheet/audio-analyzing-digital-multimeters/models-2015-and-2015-p-6-1-2-digit-thd-multimeters-and

 

Offline TheUnnamedNewbieTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1211
  • Country: 00
  • mmwave RFIC/antenna designer
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2017, 01:11:45 pm »

Btw. Keithley (Tektronix) released new version of K2015 datasheet where they warn about availability of K2015 in EU:

This product is not updated to comply with the RoHS2 Directive 2011/65/EU and will not be shipped to the EU. Customers may be able to purchase products from inventory that were placed on the EU market prior to July 22, 2017 until supplies are depleted.



The 10 M? and 100 M? ranges are not that important to me, so I think I'll take the THD functionality (and then mainly the low-frequency high-linearity signal generator) over the slightly worse range.

Regarding the RoHS stuff: The unit I wish to get it second hand and already within the EU and thus does not fall under that law.
Thanks for pointing it out though.
The best part about magic is when it stops being magic and becomes science instead

"There was no road, but the people walked on it, and the road came to be, and the people followed it, for the road took the path of least resistance"
 

Offline HalFET

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 512
  • Country: 00
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2017, 01:14:18 pm »
Does the 2015 also suffer from the leaky cap issue?
 

Offline TheUnnamedNewbieTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1211
  • Country: 00
  • mmwave RFIC/antenna designer
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2017, 04:36:09 pm »
Well, I ended up running into an auction for a Keithley 2000. In the end I went for that, since the end cost was about 1/4 lower, and I doubt I was gonna use the 2015's THD functionality all that much. Better put that saved money into the testleads.

Thanks for the help anyways, guys!
The best part about magic is when it stops being magic and becomes science instead

"There was no road, but the people walked on it, and the road came to be, and the people followed it, for the road took the path of least resistance"
 

Offline HalFET

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 512
  • Country: 00
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2017, 04:53:41 pm »
Well, I ended up running into an auction for a Keithley 2000. In the end I went for that, since the end cost was about 1/4 lower, and I doubt I was gonna use the 2015's THD functionality all that much. Better put that saved money into the testleads.

Thanks for the help anyways, guys!
Replace the capacitors.
 

Offline TheUnnamedNewbieTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1211
  • Country: 00
  • mmwave RFIC/antenna designer
Re: Any reason not to get a Keithley 2015 (instead of Keithley 2000)
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2017, 05:07:22 pm »

Replace the capacitors.

Already made a post in the repair section to ask about what capacitors to get, since I will do that as soon as I get the unit!
The best part about magic is when it stops being magic and becomes science instead

"There was no road, but the people walked on it, and the road came to be, and the people followed it, for the road took the path of least resistance"
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf