I just looked at Lecroy and it's a bit like what you said. It records the trigger source and trigger coupling, but some parameters such as "limit range", "Upper level", "Lower Level",etc have not been saved.I haven't understood the logic behind this yet. Why are some parameters saved and some not.
So both methods are reasonable, Siglent is closer to keysight.
No, Siglent is just the opposite of lecroy then. Every parameter is saved for the trigger type, except trigger level. This i would call inconsistent. This is, what people will confuse, if they are not working with the scope every day.
Just think about this:
Why dont you want to give each channel its own private trigger settings (for each "simple" trigger), when each channel (signal) has its own characteristics? You already do this on the trigger level for each channel!
"So both methods are reasonable, Siglent is closer to keysight." A person says.
"No, Siglent is just the opposite of lecroy then." Your answer.
You are arguing even when people didn't say anything contrary to you.
As I said before, you are spending enormous amount of energy to basically force manufacturer to do your bidding.
You forcefully want to change how basic function on complete line of products work because you think you are more important and smarter than other 7 billion people on planet.
It was explained before: there is no BEST, automagical solution to have magical triggers, otherwise it would have been found in last 50 years.
Triggering can be used in so many user patterns that there is no single way to make them that will fit all.
Oscilloscope is no cigarette lighter: press here, fire comes on the other side.
I would argue that it is much more complicated to drive than a car, for which you have to pass driving school and exam.
The way triggers now behave are such because usage patterns are such.
Old analog CRT scope by definition remembered all settings.
After first DSO came out, they did too.
After many years we have dedicated Default button on the scope.
Because unlike your opinion, many, many users have a need for scope to come to some defined starting point.
So we DON't have to go and check ALL options. We KNOW what they are and then just set those we need.
Triggers that are being changed all the time, benefit from that too. It is user responsibility to check triggers all the time to make sure it captures exactly what user wants.
What you want does not exist on any scopes. Because it is not needed, just adds to confusion to some people.
We are all different.
Again a topic, where you already wrote more than dozen posts about same thing.
Yes, you don't like how triggering setup works.
You explained what you mean.
We heard you. Repeatedly.
Martians heard you.
If there is something useful in your comments, people that actually make scopes will take it into consideration.
Nobody rejects smart ideas.
And that is it.
Let's move on, please.
There are other topics, like roof repair for instance, we still did not have talked about...