In many respects, the DS1102E looks better to me than DS1202Z-E. So don't jump to conclusions. The point of this is to apply exactly the same tests to a series of instruments and show what they do well and what they do badly. My observation of Keysight and Rohde & Schwarz new $20k instruments is they are buggy as all hell. I'm told that the Tektronix 3 series crashed during a demo for a friend. It seems that for $20k you get the privilege of being a beta tester for the top tier OEMs.
The DS1202Z-E has a bigger screen, but it is permanently cluttered by menus, so the trace display area is about the same as the DS1102E.
Sorry, but I am *not* doing videos. Not no, but hell no!
Step response *is* the last thing that a novice will think about. It's also the single best test of the performance of the AFE and the DSP design. With 30+ years of DSP experience in the oil industry, I can look at the step response and draw the AFE filter profile on a cocktail napkin. TANSTAFL You cannot have a DSO BW which is more than 50-70% of Nyquist and have the traditional analog Tek <3% overshoot.
If you need to test signal integrity for things like ringing on a data line, how do you do that if the step response has a 7% overshoot such as the Keysight MSOX3104T I bought and returned? I suspect that the MSOX3054T is actually a decent scope as it *should* be able to provide a decent step response, though the FFT is still crap.
I shall explain very thoroughly the tests and what they mean. However, this is an evening entertainment, not a job. I have other things I have to do. So it will not be quick. And I still need to get an SDS-1202X-E or similar.
Have Fun!
Reg