I think if you don't want to take the time to read the manual, you will just have to wait until they start showing up. If you followed my thread, I doubt you missed any videos.
Yes, he did limit the information. It took a fair amount of time before we knew who the supplier was. They made the software available on the web (on purpose or by mistake) and at least this is how I found out.
He also talked about it from time to time on their PodCast show as well as posting the few videos. Most of the information was under the contributor's section which would limit the exposure as well.
I was hoping he would have made a full on review of it before it started to ship as it may have proved insightful even if it had some bias. He did say they made a change to the reference but that is the only hardware change I have seen him post about. He did post a few comments comparing it with the Fluke 87V's robustness and it sounded like he was happy with it as is. While I did offer some suggestions on how they may be able to improve it's robustness (as I have shown, that stuff is not rocket science anyway), I doubt based on Dave's comments that part of the design was changed. There really would be no reason for me to repeat any of my transient tests except to document the results as he did not want the prototype meter's data published. But my guess is you will see people doing all sorts of things with it once they have it in their hands. Just takes time.