I still don't believe a word the OP says. He says no more than $200, then says no budget. In another thread he says he wants a Gossen or a Fluke. He only wants to spend $200 on an oscilloscope but can buy a DS1054Z, two Gossens and an LCR meter. This is either a troll or a "tire kicker" waste of time.
I have the money to tanke what I want a fluke oscilloscope? 1, 2,3, 4 ok, doesen' t care, i can buy what I want, BUT I DON'T TO WASTE MY MONEY
I know I know is difficult to understand
Fort the 10 time I ll repeat
I saw 200 NOT for my money but because i Tgought the best choice for a begginner was to rake some old analogue oscilloscope, but some guys here have tell me a oscilloscope will be necessary, tou have understand?
Used analog scopes will have much higher bandwidth for the same cost as a new DSO. That's true! But, that's used analog vs new DSO!
I bought a used Tektronix 485 350 MHz scope for $200 about 12 years ago and it has served me well. I will keep it forever!
But I recently bought a DS1054Z for the features. My old scope was dual channel and I wanted 4 channels for looking at SPI. My new scope has decoding for various serial protocols and it has single shot mode. It also has a lot of arithmetic functions, measurement capability and numerous trigger functions that my old scope could never have. There is no comparison on features. Yes, the 485 has higher bandwidth and the DS1054Z only has 100 MHz (after unlocking) but that is a tradeoff I can live with. When I need the higher bandwidth, I probably don't need the features. And the other way around, I usually run SPI in the 10 MHz range and 100 MHz is plenty of bandwidth for my microcontroller and FPGA projects.
I certainly didn't NEED a new scope but I'm real glad I bought it. I have a lot to learn re: DSOs but, in the meantime, it isn't significantly different, in concept, that any other scope. It just does a LOT more!
I also have multimeters, several in fact, including a Fluke 189 which is a very nice meter. I don't have a bench meter and my latest DMM is the EEVBlog branded Brymem BM235. That Brymem is a pretty nice meter. There are others in the $100 range that I would consider. The Fluke is excellent but it is very pricey and I'm not really sure it is that much better for the extra $300. Maybe I just bought it as my first truly decent DMM and didn't care about the price. I'm not sure I would buy it today. I might buy 3 of the BM235s and call it good.
There are dozens of good scopes and I only own two so I can't say anything about the others. If I were rich, I would be buying Keysight something or other. Certainly something in the 500 MHz 4 channel range. Alas, I'm not! The DS1054Z will get me by quite nicely.
If budget is a limiting factor and the $400 cost of the DS1054Z is an issue, an analog scope is still a viable solution. The problem is, how do you know you didn't just order a box of rocks? Even if you get a scope, what if it doesn't work? Knobs missing, switches dirty, etc. Can you fix it? You take a huge risk when buying something off of eBay.
Anyway, it's your choice and there are certainly a number of candidate scopes.