The Shannon tweezers here are more useful now. A simple assembly of extension leads is shown below. The push on terminals grip surprisingly well and provide a reliable means to extend the leads. The terminals slide back off easily as well.
So I have made my own tips extension, based on your idea, thank you
I have found about the same push on terminal as yours, and have soldered a rigid copper on it.
(we have no news from him since some times, don't know if he goes here to check his topic )
Hello guys, I definitely read all of your posts.
I have gained a lot of support and confidence from them. So many good comments, each one is enough to make me happy for a night.
Thank you all, tautech, KungFuJosh, ceut, Grandchuck and so many guys.
And Martin72, I look forward your comparison work
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/shannon-st42-lcr-tweezer-test-and-comparison-thread/You were confused by everyone's praise, but still place the order with doubt, you tested it seriously and output hardcore works, which really made me nervous, maybe no more than two seconds
, I hope the ST42 didn't disappoint you
Thank you both, but I would like a concrete answer to my question about what makes this device better than cheaper ones to buy.
Thanks a lot for your question, I am also thinking about the answer to this question.
Good comments make me gain confidence, bad comments/suggestions make me progress.
Of course I still remember the original promise, good suggestions will be fed back.
Seeing that so many guys is trying to modify the measurement width of the tweezers, I really started to think about this seriously, especially Martin72's elegant work angered me, I hope to bring a modification that is more gorgeous than Martin72
Originally, I thought that large components are not so commonly used, and flying wires can also solve the problem when needed.
It seems that this is only true for me.
Especially some netizens were considering buying a bench LCR to support daily work, due to the tip of the tweezers was not wide enough