Author Topic: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels  (Read 274 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online LocatorTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: us
Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« on: Yesterday at 06:40:25 am »
Hello.

In looking at a couple of clamp meters - the Fluke 374FC and 376FC, I noticed the 376 measures AC and DC current, up to 1000 amps. The 374 measures up to 600 amps. (I would never be measuring anything even as high as 600 amps.)

Would the 374 tend to be more accurate in the lower ranges than the 376FC, due to the 376 having a higher limit?

I prefer to get the 376FC kit, as it comes with the magnetic strap and the IFlex loop, but hope I wouldn’t be handicapped on the low ranges.

Thanks.
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16962
  • Country: 00
Re: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 06:53:58 am »
I'm sure there's specifications for both somewhere on the web...
 

Offline BeBuLamar

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: us
Re: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 09:27:57 am »
I picked the 374 because it's cheaper and I don't need to measure more than 600A. The accuracy/resolution below 600A are the same. The resolution for both is only .1A. The 376 can measure frequency and higher resistance which I would use the DMM for. One thing I am dissapointed about them is they don't have good enough resolution when measure low current. If you measure something about a couple of Amps you only have 2 digits. The cheaper 325 has better resolution.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 09:30:59 am by BeBuLamar »
 

Online Phil1977

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 489
  • Country: de
Re: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 09:42:41 am »
Don't forget that there is a physical relation between open clamp area and low current accuracy.

Little clamp areas do not catch so much magnetic stray field. That´s why most clamps with mA-resolution barely fit around an AWG6 wire.
 
The following users thanked this post: myf

Offline BeBuLamar

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: us
Re: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 10:39:30 am »
Also I have the Iflex but I never use it. Besides you can only measure AC current with it.
 

Online LocatorTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: us
Re: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« Reply #5 on: Today at 07:42:15 am »
I picked the 374 because it's cheaper and I don't need to measure more than 600A. The accuracy/resolution below 600A are the same. The resolution for both is only .1A. The 376 can measure frequency and higher resistance which I would use the DMM for. One thing I am dissapointed about them is they don't have good enough resolution when measure low current. If you measure something about a couple of Amps you only have 2 digits. The cheaper 325 has better resolution.

I didn’t realize this. I was testing a 374 and a 325 on a small house fan. The 325 showed 2.89 amps. The 376 showed 2 amps. That’s very disappointing. I would need to do more lower measurements like this, than higher measurements. I wanted the inrush feature, which is why I was looking at the 376. It’s not on the 325. I wanted to check the inrush on some servers and beefy workstations at startup.

Wow, only showing something like 2amp for an around 2.9amp load is going to be a handicap.
 

Online LocatorTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: us
Re: Clamp Meter Accuracy in Lower Levels
« Reply #6 on: Today at 07:42:47 am »
Don't forget that there is a physical relation between open clamp area and low current accuracy.

Little clamp areas do not catch so much magnetic stray field. That´s why most clamps with mA-resolution barely fit around an AWG6 wire.

That’s good to know - I didn’t realize that.
 
The following users thanked this post: myf


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf