Sure thing, but for my hobby I don't have a real LCR (high frequency) meter, so I'm using the pulse-train-based budget CTester clones (k-firmware, m-firmware) to get a rule of thumb on whether I shall replace or not a capacitor (most of times electrolitic for through-hole power supplies).
What got my attention is the tenfold difference estimation on each firmware branch, I haven't paid attention to that until know (as the modded m-firmware clones ran quickly from my hands). If you tell me you're trying to assimilate the values to those we would obtain from an LCR, that would be enough reasoning for me. But it you tell me "k-firmware does a better job on that regard" (moreover for lower capacitance, IIUC) I wonder why you chosed to go that path? Of course there should be reasons for that, but I also wonder why we would compromise for less accuracy if we know better, again, if that's the case.
Anyways, what about the Vloss and/or Iloss, if the values are accurate enough, we could judge based on that, or better on the the whole-picture, I suppose.