The pico and nano handpieces look identical, so I’d also be surprised if there were any mechanical differences between the handpieces.
IIRC they have the same PCB inside. However plastic heater part is of larger diameter AFAIK.
If you recall correctly or know from what source? I haven’t seen any teardowns of any of the Mk2 handpieces.
The thing that makes me very curious is the Mk2 heaters
All MK2/trace stations use the same heater, including pico. So the only difference probably is a power cord, maybe plastic materials.
No, they do not. I listed above which ones use which of the two Mk2 heaters that exist. I had checked Ersa’s own spare parts shop (ersashop.com) before writing above. Did you not read that part of my post?
Here it is again:
Oddly, the i-Tool Mk2 and nano Mk2 use the same heater too, but the pico Mk2 shares its heater with the i-Tool Trace, which is an ESD-safe production station, so that heater has to be grounded too. So I wonder why the nano Mk2 and pico Mk2 don’t share a heater now.
Again, this information is straight from Ersa.
i-Tool Mk1 (0100CDJ) and i-Tool nano Mk1 (0120CDK) use heater 010102J
i-Tool pico Mk1 (0130CDK) uses heater 013100J
i-Tool Mk2 (0105CDJ) and i-Tool nano Mk2 (0125CDK) use heater 016100J
i-Tool Trace (0140CDJ) and i-Tool pico Mk2 (0135CDK) use heater 014100J
They Mk2 heaters look identical from the photos (which unfortunately are at different angles), but there must be some difference or they wouldn’t make two different heater models. Thus my wondering what the difference is.