Author Topic: New Project a BatterRUSEr  (Read 33306 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Godzil

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 458
  • Country: fr
    • My own blog
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #25 on: August 21, 2015, 01:19:05 pm »
@AF6LJ : Ok I'll add one  :-+

Added one, could you check if it match your expectations? :D
« Last Edit: August 21, 2015, 01:25:03 pm by Godzil »
When you make hardware without taking into account the needs of the eventual software developers, you end up with bloated hardware full of pointless excess. From the outset one must consider design from both a hardware and software perspective.
-- Yokoi Gunpei
 

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 38035
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #26 on: August 21, 2015, 01:32:24 pm »
Silkscreen Probes The Monkey on the underside!
 

Offline Godzil

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 458
  • Country: fr
    • My own blog
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #27 on: August 21, 2015, 01:39:16 pm »
Silkscreen Probes The Monkey on the underside!

That would make sense!
When you make hardware without taking into account the needs of the eventual software developers, you end up with bloated hardware full of pointless excess. From the outset one must consider design from both a hardware and software perspective.
-- Yokoi Gunpei
 

Offline Berni

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5007
  • Country: si
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #28 on: August 21, 2015, 01:58:35 pm »
While looking at the thread i was wondering if the static draw could be solved by adding some sort of mosfet switch circuit to connect the battery directly to the output when the voltage is above 1.2V and only switch on the converter when it drops.

I know 1.5V is a really small voltage to drive a mosfets gate with, but perhaps there are special ones that can do this?
 

Offline timb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2536
  • Country: us
  • Pretentiously Posting Polysyllabic Prose
    • timb.us
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #29 on: August 21, 2015, 02:26:59 pm »

Joke aside, I am really interest to see some real test results that is not constrained by miniaturization. Betteriser claimed miniaturization that can deliver 1.5A. Did they really show the 1.5A part?
No, but they already showed a 3D model, and a monkey's ass.
Jokes aside, more than 6 years ago Michrochip demoed me the MCP1642 which is a boost converter working down to 0.35V after startup. The output voltage is minimum 2V. They designed it to drive gadgets (way too noisy for anything important) from a single primary cell, and it costs 0.35 USD. I guess they are smashing their head into the wall, because they should have made the output voltage go to 1.5V.

Hehe... Jim Williams did one better. Here's a discrete design using a single LTC1440 comparator and JFET that *STARTS* and runs from as little as 275mV: http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/application-note/an113f.pdf


Sent from my Tablet
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic; e.g., Cheez Whiz, Hot Dogs and RF.
 

Offline Godzil

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 458
  • Country: fr
    • My own blog
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #30 on: August 21, 2015, 03:43:32 pm »
I'm working on a new revision, more to come later tonight (UK time) or during the weekend, I hope you will enjoy the updated version!
When you make hardware without taking into account the needs of the eventual software developers, you end up with bloated hardware full of pointless excess. From the outset one must consider design from both a hardware and software perspective.
-- Yokoi Gunpei
 

Offline mewyn

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #31 on: August 21, 2015, 04:07:24 pm »
My layout:


Is that big inductor you've got there, or are you just pleased to see me?

Yes.

I figured in making this I wanted to surpass the Batteriser in performance, be able to make something that didn't have that little pissant inductor that they used, one which I doubt would be able to hold enough energy to deliver a hundred milliamps, let alone the amp and a half they are saying it can deliver.  It already couldn't fit in a battery compartment, so you know, just go whole-hog and make it as good as I can ;)

 

Offline eas

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 601
  • Country: us
    • Tech Obsessed
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #32 on: August 21, 2015, 05:24:08 pm »
I've been working on my own approach to this problem. The theory of operation is that I create a small black hole and take advantage of time dilation to make it seem like the battery is lasting 8 times longer. Its complete bullshit, of course, but my assumption is that the sudden appearance of a tiny black hole is going to going to misdirect people from my little con.

Oh, any ideas on how I can create the black hole?  I've decided ultracapacitors are a good starting point, and some of those cool rare-earth magnets, and some sort of crystal...  Oh, and I'll call it a "green hole" for marketing purposes, of course.
 

Offline fcb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2125
  • Country: gb
  • Test instrument designer/G1YWC
    • Electron Plus
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #33 on: August 21, 2015, 05:47:33 pm »
I hope none of you get burgled by industrial spies looking to steal your prototypes.  Also, in England, one might call the device a Twateriser.
https://electron.plus Power Analysers, VI Signature Testers, Voltage References, Picoammeters, Curve Tracers.
 

Offline firewalker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2450
  • Country: gr
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #34 on: August 21, 2015, 06:00:02 pm »
Stop calling the 1.5 volts cell a battery. :P :P :P

Alexander.
Become a realist, stay a dreamer.

 

Offline AF6LJ

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2902
  • Country: us
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #35 on: August 21, 2015, 09:41:10 pm »
@AF6LJ : Ok I'll add one  :-+

Added one, could you check if it match your expectations? :D

:D
That's Great
Sue AF6LJ
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #36 on: August 21, 2015, 09:44:22 pm »
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline Jay_Diddy_BTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2738
  • Country: ca
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #37 on: August 22, 2015, 11:48:31 am »
Hi,

Please check this link:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=TWAT


I hope we are talking definition 4 or 6.

Jay_Diddy_B

 

Offline Macbeth

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2571
  • Country: gb
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #38 on: August 22, 2015, 12:25:19 pm »
It's usually 2 and 5 in the UK. Used in much the same way as cunt.
 

Offline Jay_Diddy_BTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2738
  • Country: ca
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #39 on: August 25, 2015, 03:58:08 am »
Hi,

I have built the BatterRUSEr.

Here is the latest version of my schematic:



And the board layout:




This is a photograph of the blank board next to an AA battery:



And the assembled board:




Initial Tests

Vin was set to 1.1V (nominal)
The load current was set to 250 mA (nominal)


Vin, measured at the board 1.0893V
Iin = 425 mA

Vout, measured at the board 1.4965V
Iout, measured 251.45mA


Power In = 463mW

Power Out =375mW

Measured Efficiency = 375/463 x100 = 81%

Note: No attempt was made to optimize the efficiency. There is not too much I can do, only inductor selection.

Even with this simple measurement 20% of the power is lost in the boost converter.

I will do some measurements as time permits.

What would you like me to measure?

Regards,

Jay_Diddy_B


 

Offline pickle9000

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2439
  • Country: ca
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #40 on: August 25, 2015, 04:31:07 am »
If anyone asks for a comparison between kilohamsters to milligerbils then that's probably the batterizer guys.
 

Offline Joule Thief

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 249
  • Country: us
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #41 on: August 25, 2015, 04:47:35 am »
If anyone asks for a comparison between kilohamsters to milligerbils then that's probably the batterizer guys.

If that happens we can have nanofrog answer their inquiry!   :-DD
Perturb and observe.
 

Offline pickle9000

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2439
  • Country: ca
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #42 on: August 25, 2015, 04:52:38 am »
If anyone asks for a comparison between kilohamsters to milligerbils then that's probably the batterizer guys.

If that happens we can have nanofrog answer their inquiry!   :-DD

And be very careful with your answers, they will end up in the next video proof.
 

Offline pickle9000

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2439
  • Country: ca
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #43 on: August 25, 2015, 05:14:22 am »
@ Jay_Diddy_B

I apologize for the interruption, we will now return to scheduled programming...... in theory
 

Offline AccountRemovedPerUsersRequest

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • !
  • Posts: 117
  • Country: ee
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #44 on: August 25, 2015, 05:57:14 am »
If anyone asks for a comparison between kilohamsters to milligerbils then that's probably the batterizer guys.

No need to ask because we already know the answer: the ratio between kilohamsters and milligerbils is 800%. However you need to ask if you need a scientific explanation. The original mathematical formula is almost impossible to solve because of "clapping monkey constant" in it.

A.
 

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 38035
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #45 on: August 25, 2015, 06:04:27 am »
You should be able to get 90% with that puppy with careful selection.
 

Offline AmmoJammo

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 814
  • Country: au
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #46 on: August 25, 2015, 07:00:04 am »
You should be able to get 90% with that puppy with careful selection.

Wouldn't that only be at the ideal current though? doesn't the efficiency vary with load anyway? so even if it does 90% in one situation, 80% seems like a reasonable assumption, as a best case scenario, for the butteriser, especially considering its limited space for an inductor.

Jay_Diddy, what does your boost converter do with a 500ma load? or 1.5 amps like the butteriser claims to do?
 

Offline Delta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1221
  • Country: gb
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #47 on: August 25, 2015, 07:47:33 am »
Good work Jay!

Can you get some AA batteries and try running various products directly and then with your BatteRUSER, see which has the longer run time?
 

Offline pickle9000

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2439
  • Country: ca
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #48 on: August 25, 2015, 08:14:01 am »
@Jay_Diddy_B

- Have you made multiple boards?
- Do you have dummy AA's so you can plug into a real device easily?

I was thinking a two cell configuration is normally what I see in a product. 
 

Offline deephaven

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 796
  • Country: gb
  • Civilization is just one big bootstrap
    • Deephaven Ltd
Re: New Project a BatterRUSEr
« Reply #49 on: August 25, 2015, 08:57:36 am »
@Jay_Diddy_B

What's the consumption at light loads and no loads?

 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf