The TAPR license hinges on this text:
1.5 By (a) using, copying, modifying, or distributing the
Documentation, or (b) making or having Products made or distributing
them, you accept this Agreement, agree to comply with its terms, and
become a "Licensee."
However, I do not believe (b) has any grounds. I simply am not obligated to accept such an agreement in order to manufacture a design, and if I do not distribute design files I am not violating any copyright.
The CERN license sidesteps this by applying to documentation and patents, which can be protected. However, they still try some verbal trickery by conflating "design" and "design documentation" - one is protected, one is not.