Author Topic: Keysight Scope Giveaway, Canadians and South Africans must pass a math test  (Read 2224 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kg4arnTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Country: us
So my friend actually won the Keysight scope giveaway. 
Take a look at item 15 of the acceptance form.
Canadians and South Africans must pass a Mathematical Skill Test

  ****************************
15. For Residents of Canada and South Africa Only: To be declared a winner, in accordance with local laws, Canadian and South African residents must correctly answer the mathematical skill-testing question below without any assistance of any kind:
Mathematical Skill-Testing Question:
Step 1: Multiply 15 by 60
Step 2: Add 150 to the answer from Step 1
Step 3: Divide the answer from Step 2 by 5
Step 4: Subtract 25 from the answer to Step 3
My answer to the mathematical skill-testing question above is: ______________________


******************************

 
 

Offline georges80

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 915
  • Country: us
The 'test' is most likely to comply with some law or other regarding contests & prizes in those particular countries and possibly various tax implications...

cheers,
george.
 

Offline kg4arnTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Country: us
Agree.  I didn't think Keysight came up with it.
Seems like an odd legal requirement
 

Offline Len

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 551
  • Country: ca
The 'test' is most likely to comply with some law or other regarding contests & prizes in those particular countries and possibly various tax implications...

That's right, it's to pretend the giveaway is a contest of skill, to avoid anti-gambling laws.
DIY Eurorack Synth: https://lenp.net/synth/
 

Offline Brumby

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12353
  • Country: au
Australia specifically has very, very complex regulations and a very long registration process with the local government.  We definitely wanted to include Australia, we just couldn't do it in a legally compliant way.

I will admit I don't know what the full legal situation is here in Australia - but I suspect the reason it is not easy is to make it difficult for sleazy operators, preventing them from using the system.

I do remember years ago legally you could not hold a 'raffle' but you could have a game of skill - and where there was more than one successful entry, you could draw a winner out of a hat.
The solution was to have a  G _ _ S _ I N _     C _ M P _ T _ T I _ N

The idea has been around for a while.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2016, 12:19:03 am by Brumby »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf