Author Topic: Electric fence  (Read 3756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6810
  • Country: nl
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #50 on: June 12, 2024, 06:41:40 pm »
If you can make the RC time large enough you can just treat the pulse as a dirac pulse and it works even when the pulse changes a bit. Or they could measure two pulses with two different resistors, but the large resistors seem to be in series.

What's the value of those large resistors? It's hard to read the colours from the video.

PS. maybe they switch an extra small value capacitor in series with the ground plane to get two different measurements with two unknowns from two pulses? (ground plane parasitic capacitance to earth and pulse amplitude.)
« Last Edit: June 12, 2024, 10:25:54 pm by Marco »
 

Offline PlainNameTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7035
  • Country: va
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #51 on: June 12, 2024, 08:06:08 pm »
Quote
What's the value of those large resistors?

I'll let you know at the weekend :)
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6810
  • Country: nl
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #52 on: June 13, 2024, 08:45:20 pm »
Here's a patent for a different type, they make the handle conductive so they can use the body capacitance as a decent ground relative to the capacitance of their capacitive divider (ie. they make the divider << 100 pf).

https://patents.google.com/patent/US9829515B1/en

Though that still doesn't explain how the hotline one works. AFAICS the capacitance to ground will be significantly smaller and less predictable, making everything harder.

PS. I guess I'm making it harder than it needs to be, I guess it's just a resistive divider and a peak detector, treating the ground plane stray capacitance as a very temporary earth. I was thinking all the parasitic capacitances of the components would mess it up, but I'm probably overthinking it.

PPS. works well enough in simulation as long as capacitance to ground is more than a couple pf and the capacitance across the top resistor is small enough.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2024, 04:54:22 pm by Marco »
 

Offline PlainNameTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7035
  • Country: va
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #53 on: June 13, 2024, 09:34:56 pm »
Quote
PS. I guess I'm making it harder than it needs to be, I guess it's just a resistive divider and a peak detector, treating the ground plane stray capacitance as a very temporary earth.

That's what I would guess too, and how I would look at doing this. I have an advantage in that I can use actual ground (since it would be an automated monitor without a user holding it), but I would still like it capacitively coupled.
 

Offline PlainNameTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7035
  • Country: va
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #54 on: June 14, 2024, 07:42:52 pm »
Photos attached - they are big for clarity.

There isn't a decent ground plane on this, and just to make sure I operated it using plastic tweezers so my hand was relatively distant. There was not discernible difference to normal operation, so I don't think the user is part of it.

Components around the hot end, rounded to nearest E24 value:


R8   10M
R9   10M
R10   510K
R11   7.5K
R2   10M
R5   10M
R54   470K
C2   3.6uF
C4   1nF
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6810
  • Country: nl
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #55 on: June 14, 2024, 11:09:03 pm »
"C2      3.6uF"

Doubt ;)
 

Offline PlainNameTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7035
  • Country: va
Re: Electric fence
« Reply #56 on: June 15, 2024, 11:51:10 am »
Yeah, but that's what it measured (albeit in-circuit). I'll take another look :)
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf