Author Topic: dI/dt ? math error?  (Read 3618 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline J4e8a16nTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 222
  • Country: ca
    • Jean Pierre Daviau
dI/dt ? math error?
« on: July 11, 2013, 09:45:58 pm »
Hi,

I checked an integration 'error?'  in my book . See the red  !  .
Unfortunately the book is in french.  Anyhow . . .
Equipment Fluke, PSup..5-30V 3.4A, Owon SDS7102, Victor SGenerator,
Isn't this suppose to be a technical and exact science?
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2013, 09:56:58 pm »
Yeah, should be -1/3 ln |5-I|. Somebody missed a factor of three...

In my experience you don't usually make it far into a textbook with a bunch of math before you find an arithmetic error. Maybe my school just picks shitty books, though...
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Online IanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12302
  • Country: us
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2013, 10:13:14 pm »
Hmm? Let's work it backwards:

f(I) = -1/3 ln(15 - 3I)

Let u = 15 - 3I, then df/dI = (df/du)(du/dI), where

f(u) = -1/3 ln u

So:

df/du = (-1/3)(1/u)

du/dI = -3

df/dI = (-1/3)(1/u)(-3) = 1/u = 1 / (15 - 3I)

Which is what the book has.

So what did I get wrong?
« Last Edit: July 11, 2013, 10:16:24 pm by IanB »
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2013, 10:27:46 pm »
Actually, you're right, thank you!

The catch here is that we came to different answers through different methods, but both are correct because of the constant that is being ignored.

ln(5 - i) = ln(15 - 3i) - ln(3)

And ln(3) is of course a constant.

(I used a lowercase i for legibility)

Kind of ashamed I missed that, I used to grade math papers... :-[
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline J4e8a16nTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 222
  • Country: ca
    • Jean Pierre Daviau
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2013, 02:43:43 pm »
Why not that way?

 integration sign ((1/ (15-3i) ) dI) =

 ln|(1/ (15-3i) | =
-ln|(15-3i) | =
-|15-3i|  = e^(t-C)


and be stuck with no 1/3  :-/
Equipment Fluke, PSup..5-30V 3.4A, Owon SDS7102, Victor SGenerator,
Isn't this suppose to be a technical and exact science?
 

Online IanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12302
  • Country: us
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2013, 03:05:39 pm »
Why not that way?

 integration sign ((1/ (15-3i) ) dI) =

ln|(1/ (15-3i) | =
-ln|(15-3i) | =
-|15-3i|  = e^(t-C)


and be stuck with no 1/3  :-/

Because your working is wrong at the line indicated in red. The antiderivative of 1/x is ln x, and you are missing a factor of (-1/3):

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+1%2F%2815-3i%29+di
 

Offline J4e8a16nTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 222
  • Country: ca
    • Jean Pierre Daviau
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2013, 04:36:32 pm »
substitute u = 15-3 i
du/di = 0-3
and  du = -3  di:
du/-3  =  di
1/-3 *du  =  di

ok

-1/3 log(15+3i)) constant  = t- C
-1/3 log(15+3i))  = t- (C +constant)
log(15+3i))  =-3( t- C)

...

Why Wolfgang say?
Substitute back for u = 15-3 i: = -1/3 log(-3 (-5+i))+constant
Which is equivalent for restricted i values to:
Answer: | 
 |  = -1/3 log(5-i)+constant



Equipment Fluke, PSup..5-30V 3.4A, Owon SDS7102, Victor SGenerator,
Isn't this suppose to be a technical and exact science?
 

Online IanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12302
  • Country: us
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2013, 04:44:24 pm »
substitute u = 15-3 i
du/di = 0-3
and  du = -3  di:
du/-3  =  di
1/-3 *du  =  di

ok

-1/3 log(15+3i)) constant  = t- C
-1/3 log(15+3i))  = t- (C +constant)
log(15+3i))  =-3( t- C)


Be careful with your signs. In several places there you have changed a "-" into a "+". If you do that in a real problem you will lose marks in a test, or build something that doesn't work the way you expect...
 

Offline KJDS

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2442
  • Country: gb
    • my website holding page
Re: dI/dt ? math error?
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2013, 05:22:36 pm »
For a long time, almost every paper and book I read had errors in the equations, probably so that those who don't understand the maths can't make use of them.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf