Please guys did anyone actually read the articles provided by Batteriser?
Yep. We read it very carefully. And this is NOT a valid test report.
A very short and incomplete list of things lacking in this "test report" :
- Description of battery used ? "Duracell Alkaline" is not enough to describe it. Duracell makes several different types of AA alkaline batteries.
- Description of battery used ? Battery types, provenance, state, date printed, type number are all lacking. Nothing.
- Description of the Boost converters used : provenance, state, version, etc, etc... Nothing.
- Description of the GPS unit ? serial number, type number, provenance, etc... Nothing.
- description of the test setup. How was the "tapping" done. By whom ? when, how often? Nothing is described.
- Date of the test, ambient temperature, operator name, location, GPS reception and functionnal state ? Nothing is described. All these have a measurable influence on the test result !!
- "Record the time it took for one of the two messages to display" How is the time recorded ? what instrument is used ? what is the role of the operator ? Is he allowed to go to the toilet during the test and can he miss something? Again, absolutely nothing is described.
- "Batteriser installed" How ? Photo of the installed devices is necessary.
- "Garmin GPS shutting down." Deliberately Wrong.
- "one of the two messages to display" Which two messages ??
- Date of the test, date of the report
![Huh? ???](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/xhuh.gif.pagespeed.ic.6Nvt7O8a11.png)
?
- Test operator, and manager sign off ? there is not a single name to be found in this document.
......
This document is not a test report. it's either a fake, or a joke.