Didn't they lose the right to say Batteriser?
Maybe they shipped the "Batteriser" branded ones to countries where copyright laws are hard to enforce.
This has not got, and has
never had, anything to do with copyright law.
As I stated several times before, I wouldn't be surprised if their deal with Energizer Holdings to drop the lawsuit and the situation surrounding Batteroo's abandonment of their application for the Batteriser trademark explicitly allowed them to ship units made from the stock they had already produced of the sleeves and packaging, even in the US.
Barring that, then, yes, the logical course of action would probably be to send those early production ones to places beyond the reach of the USPTO's juristiction...
It looks like the PCB's are missing in this sleves.
I'd say this is another trick to get more time.
But I don't knew why they need more time because it looks like they didnt want to deliver at all.
etc. etc.
I can't believe how many people here are unwilling to believe that these things might actually exist.
It is not like it is actually some kind of new technology or something.
There is absolutely no reason why they could not have finally managed to actually ship some units. It
IS very surprising, of course, that they have done such a horrible job of keeping their IGG backers informed; the complete lack of pictures, etc. but it isn't like the product itself is an impossibility. They won't have shipped them without PCBs or that kind of nonsense....
It will be very interesting to finally get to see some actual performance data once we get our hands on them considering there has been a complete and utter lack of any actual data this whole bloody time! (The hallmark of bogus products everywhere...)