I doubt it, its missing more then just the RAM, an entire power phase is missing, likely for the extra RAM.
How about the eprom put on the board is non standard?
First of all gnif, you are the boss awesome for finding this hack.
I had a gtx 960 chinese fake card sent to me from a friend who bout it, then got a refund.
it's really a GTS450 gf106 192 core, 783 Mhz clocked card with a funky bios eprom that nvflash doesn't read or write to.
gpu-z can read the card, but the bios save fails.
I tried scanning the eprom with RWeverything to no avail.
The device id is 10de 1401, but it needs to be hard modded.
Per page 10 of the thread this guy did the gts450 to quadro2000 mod.
I just want to set the darn resistors back to gts 450 and use this card a mining card or simple GTS for a desktop.
Initial values are:
index meaning resistance
1 3 byte value D none
2 3 byte value C 35k
3 4 byte values 8-f none
4 4 byte values 0-7 25k
device / resistors table
device name R1 R2 R3 R4
gts 450 none 35k none 25k
Quadro 2000 35k none 5k none
now the fun part is locating the exact resistor location. I have a good idea, but I think it's counterintuitive to be jumping a blank spot with a resistor when it could be used for some other function on the card. I have steady hands and a sharp eye for a repair like this.
However, this 450 ripoff card that was flooded on Ebay look nothing like the reference card or any of the stock images on google.
I am tracing from pin 3 of the supposed eprom to the nearby resistors. I think I might be able to determine the values for the bits. I see the list of first two nibbles from page 1 of the thread as:
"
What NVidia has done is changed the way that it handles the straps, instead of just pulling the straps high or low to control the switches as they did previously, they are now read as analogue values. The scheme is as follows:
When pulling high:
5K = 8
10K = 9
15K = A
20K = B
25K = C
30K = D
35K = E
40K = F
When pulling low I expect this to be the same, but for 7 - 0, but I did not test this as the device ID I was targeting is >= 8.
There are two tiny SMD resistors on the board, one for each nibble of the PCI Device ID byte. Originally the GTX 690 has a device id of 0x1188, so to become a Quadro K5000 this has to be changed to 0x11BA, which equates to 20K and 15K resistors. If you wanted to change it to a Tesla K10, you would want to change it to 0x118F, which equates to 5K and 40K resistors.
"
----
But what about 7-0 ?
Thanks and regards..
BTW I tested the PXE boot roms for Intel NICs back in the day of early gigabit.. Intel changed the way they allowed the device ID to be changed, but for a while there were a few server cards that were desktop cards out there..