Hello everybody,
I bought some cheap RMA-223 flux on eBay and when finally it got home, I was somewhat surprised to see that the overall quality suggested a fake product.
After a 5-second search on Google, I have found that the all the RMA-223 flux products on eBay are likely fake.
This gentlemen provides some light into the issue:
http://ultrakeet.com.au/index.php?id=article&name=fluxInfoThe version I got has the "Advanced" spelled right, but the "Colifornia" is still there. Also "harn" instead of "harm", "consuit" vs "consult", "canuse", "knomn", bad spacing, actual product quantity is about 6-7cl against the 10cc advertised, etc.
From a performance perspective, the product is not that bad, although is less wetting than the usual CIF products I use at work. At least it doesn't explode when heated.
Personally, I would had no qualms about buying a "Generic" rosin mildly activated flux (i.e. properly advertised and not faked) at that (very low) price point. I find the fake products plain stupid.
Also, you have to question the fakers "design flow" & business model. While I accept that the language barrier is huge, the spelling errors are blatant. Also, I hope that they do not have recurring business with this stupid approach. Or do they?
Cheers,
Dan