The Non Linear Plasma Reactor

[Nonlinearplasma]

Communication skills are a skill set i havent mastered as well as other because of how i think. I wish i was a Jordan Peterson with articulation of language but im not.

That is an important skill, in many areas/walks of life.  But not everyone is good at it.  Some tasks, such as writing software which is only ever worked on by the author, and other things.  Are not too badly off, if the person doesn't have the best communication skills.
I suspect, that in many cases, even if the person involved is convinced, it can't be improved.  Communication skills can be improved.

In some cases, unfortunately/sadly, it can be very difficult, or somewhat not possible, to understand the thing in question.

Remember when Einstein released SR and it was said that only 1 man understood it. The domino effect of that 1 man was massive. We are not disproving, we are standing on the shoulders of giants and understanding deeper what they were looking at. They used terms to replace observers such as north and south or positive or negative. Einstein just missed Maxwell's mistake, because of Newtons mistake and them men changed our world so we can hardly say it was an obvious mistake given their lack of knowledge of the plasma and electrical laws of motion that we know now.

If you start to view the helical wave as a wave function like an atom of hydrogen with lobes and change the colours between any 2 observers you start to see how they change inside the sun as the solar cycle field change.

A laser dot is the exponential wave energy peak of the of light.

Electricity is the exponential energy wave peak of the Poloidal axis of Magnetism

Magnetic poles are the exponential energy peak of a uniform rotational helical wave inside the magnet

Gravity is the exponential energy peak of the negative wave of motion to the central axis

Electrons in the atom are the polidal axis energy creating loops and nodes as the wave function lopes back over in the quadrope axis to meet the equatorial wave. Creating little peaks of "negative" energy to the motion of the proton or neutron.

The neutron is the proton spinning the opposite way and cancelling out the proton wave to the same observer. To the opposite observer the proton becomes the neutron. And the Electrons are still a negative wave tough of the motion of both.

I didnt want to go into quantum mechanics until the wave functions for different observers are understood, and how the different terms change value to 2 opposite observers but maybe you have to. Let me know. Im learning how to explain it as well, and when the right questions start because your understanding is growing it becomes a snowball effect.

It chases ppl away when you say the Electron is an energy wave peak for electricity and a trough for quantum mechanics, but that is what switch its value to a negative has done to our perspective of the wave due to it being found before the neutron in electricty. Because basically you have to agree that the electron and proton as a particle doesnt exist and is a wave. Which trust me for a glorified sparky is tough to explain with out sounding crazy and maintain credibility. For the invention he has designed to harness the Plasma exponential wave peak.

[Nonlinearplasma]

It like explaining left can also be right to a child and then say up can be down for some people but not for others. And thats would be very tough to explain to a 5 year year old.

Please Note i know this is much more complicated than that, im not saying anyone is a 5 year old. Its an anology to hope it makes sense when looking at wave functions from multiple perspectives at the same time. Just like the clockface.

[rob77]

exponential energy peak of the negative wave of motion to the central axis

stop smoking that stuff and rather start selling it, you'd be freaking rich in no time 

[MK14]

Remember when Einstein released SR and it was said that only 1 man understood it. The domino effect of that 1 man was massive. We are not disproving, we are standing on the shoulders of giants and understanding deeper what they were looking at. They used terms to replace observers such as north and south or positive or negative. Einstein just missed Maxwell's mistake, because of Newtons mistake and them men changed our world so we can hardly say it was an obvious mistake given their lack of knowledge of the plasma and electrical laws of motion that we know now.

When one hears about Einstein's great work.  You have to be rather careful.  What you are often NOT being told or seeing, is the countless other theories that Einstein and thousands or even millions of others, created in their minds, and sometimes on paper.  Which after consideration by the author(s), other scientists or people, various reviews and publishing options, and so on.  Possibly even moving on to the experimentation stage and/or comparison with measurable/observable things, such as stars in our galaxy.

So, although a few (very few really), of those upcoming, gems of new ideas/theories/inventions occurred, over the last hundreds or even thousands or more years.  The vast bulk of them (thousands, millions, maybe even billions of them), failed because of one or more faults/mistakes/misunderstandings in their original ideas.

I.e. For every successful idea/theory/invention/patent, there have probably been hundreds, thousands or even considerably more things which failed to work out, and so have generally been forgotten over the years, and disappeared from our collective (world wide) knowledge base.

Take rubber as an example (I'm saying this from memory, so may be mixed up about it).  It took someone/people, hundreds of different experiments, to find a formulation of rubber, that actually worked, to make a (relatively) long lasting material, which didn't horribly deteriorate, after only a few weeks.
Ironically, none of those hundreds or thousands of experimental chemical mixes actually worked, but one day there was an accident in the lab, and 'something' (Sulfur) was accidentally knocked onto the experimental rubber setup.  Amazingly, the new rubber worked out very well, and lasted a long time.

Apparently, it took many hundreds of further experiments (finding the exact relative quantities, may also have been an issue), to find out what substance(s), had been accidentally mixed into the rubber experiment, to make it last so long.
Hence vulcanization (by adding Sulfur), was invented (strictly speaking (partly accidentally) discovered).

So one really needs to go through various ways in which, your new idea, might be wrong/mistaken or in difficulties.  Discover those issue(s), now.  Then suitably modify your idea(s), or abandon them, for better future ideas.

Analogy:
The original inventor of rubber vulcanization.  Might have initially tried mixing it with honey, with terrible results.  Almost everyone told them honey was no good, and the experiments showed that rubber + honey = a messy substance, which falls apart, almost immediately, smells funny after a few days, and attracts flies like crazy.  It also makes your fingers sticky, after handling it.

Therefore, the right thing is to try another substance, or hundreds more, and move on.  If the original inventor had obsessively stuck with honey, as the vulcanization method/substance.  We probably would never have heard of the inventor of rubber, and they perhaps would have lived the rest of their lives, as a penniless person, unknown to others, who brings this smelly fly attracting, black gooey mess with them, where ever they go.

TL;DR
Does your theories have any significant flaws.  If so, can they be fixed, or do you need to move on, to a new, better idea/theory/possible-invention.

In other words, sadly.  The vast bulk, perhaps 99.9% or even 99.99999999999999999999%, of new ideas, are no good, problematic, and not really worth pursing.  If you want to be like Thomas Edison, then you have to move on and try/invent more stuff.  Don't stick with the same thing all the time, if it has issues.
Thomas Edison and his helpers, had to try out thousands (very approximately, I'm not exactly sure), of different light bulb filament options.  Until he/they found ones, which could light (without burning out), for a practically long enough time.  Many tests worked, but the filament burnt out way too quickly, for practical use.

[bdunham7]

If we try and use the electrical laws derived from Maxwell's equations to calculate the energy or power of an electromagnetic waves around a toroid (the electric field and magnetic field). We know there is current because its rotating charge and a magnetic field is being produced. So we can work out the current with our invisible clamp meter and we know the resistance of a superconductor. We dont gnerate electricity energy with superconductors but a plasma superconductor does generate energy. Lets say we measured 1000A around a toros that has a resistance of zero. Mathimatically it cant generated "voltage" which is a measure of amplitude above the axis. Since anything multiplied by zero is zero. The same goes for all other resistance calculations. The magnetic field is produced by current and therefore power or energy cannot be zero,

You are conflating power and energy and perhaps this error is central to your entire 'theory'.  A simple superconductor model can posit a superconducting ring with a continuous current and a resultant magnetic field, and indeed if the superconductor has R=0 and I=something, V=something X 0  = 0.  That just means that the power dissipated by the system is zero, not that the energy is zero.  You can calculate the energy of the circulating elecrons with ordinary known laws of physics.

There's no energy creation involved, even in a 'plasma superconductor' assuming you have such a thing.  The existence and maintenance of a steady magnetic field does not require any energy input.  That's why we can have permanent magnets.

[bdunham7]

We are not disproving, we are standing on the shoulders of giants and understanding deeper what they were looking at.

"We"?  You aren't standing on anyone's shoulders because you apparently haven't bothered to acquire the education that would allow you to comprehend even the basics of what your giants have produced.

[Nonlinearplasma]

You are conflating power and energy and perhaps this error is central to your entire 'theory'.  A simple superconductor model can posit a superconducting ring with a continuous current and a resultant magnetic field, and indeed if the superconductor has R=0 and I=something, V=something X 0  = 0.  That just means that the power dissipated by the system is zero, not that the energy is zero.  You can calculate the energy of the circulating elecrons with ordinary known laws of physics.

There's no energy creation involved, even in a 'plasma superconductor' assuming you have such a thing.  The existence and maintenance of a steady magnetic field does not require any energy input.  That's why we can have permanent magnets.

You are correct, im conflating power an energy, since 1 is the measurement of the other. And in a 3 phase system, the total energy value propagated under the 2 electromagnetic waves is effectively a calculation of area under the wave.

You can read about that here, try to read it thinking that they are measureing energy propragating around the conductor. Half is in the magnetic field and the other half the magnetic field because they are perpendicular to each other measureing the helical wave.

As an electromagnetic field propagates it transports energy. Let $P$ be the power per unit area carried by an electromagnetic wave: i.e., $P$ is the energy transported per unit time across a unit cross-sectional area perpendicular to the direction in which the wave is traveling. Consider a plane electromagnetic wave propagating along the $z$-axis. The wave propagates a distance $c\,dt$ along the $z$-axis in a time interval $dt$. If we consider a cross-sectional area $A$ at right-angles to the $z$-axis, then in a time $dt$ the wave sweeps through a volume $dV$ of space, where $dV = A\,c\,d t$. The amount of energy filling this volume is
\begin{displaymath}
d W = w\,d V = \epsilon_0\,E^2\, A\,c\,d t.
\end{displaymath}   (334)

It follows, from the definition of $P$, that the power per unit area carried by the wave is given by
\begin{displaymath}
P = \frac{d W}{A\,d t} = \frac{ \epsilon_0\,E^2\, A\,c\,d t}{A\,dt},
\end{displaymath}   (335)

https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/302l/lectures/node119.html

Essential we measure energy as the area under the 2 perpendicular electric wnd magnetic fields. The star point if used to measure the energy of all 3 waves in a 3 phase electrical circuit must equal zero. But this is false. Because that axis is a z pinch and produces torque because of the second axis of rotation. This is why the term the right hand rule of magnetism is used. Because it was the only way to understand the force produced by the mathimatical zero energy value. Again like the toroids poloidal axis, the star point of the 3 phase electrical wave cant view the negative value. The toroid being a 360° wave in both planes. Rather than just 3 electric waves and 3 magnetic waves in the 3 phase system.

To correctly harness the power in the simple superconducting ring with a continuous current, the poloidal axis must be also made of superconducting material. Not doing so would be the equivalent of using air instead of iron in a transformer. This is why the plasma reactors poloidal energy level will be so high from the exponential wave peak inducing ridiculous levels of current into the superconducting z pinch. Once the plasma leaves the z pinch the resistance increase and the plasma slows and expands. If it hits plasma current travelling anti parallel then it must expand with explosive force. Aka anti gravity.

The creation of a steady magnetic field requires steady and uniform rotating motion of the wave function of the atom. The electric field produces the dipole, the magnetic field produces the quadrupoles. Or to put it correctly the poloidal rotation of the dipole produces the electric field and the roll around the equatorial axis of the toroid produces the magnetic field. The magnetic field is never static because the same observer views the roll change every 90° of rotation. Only the dipole remains static to a stationary observer and this change is not noticed by the wave merging on the poloidal axis on each face of the magnet, termed north and south poles. To say it takes no energy to rotate the atomic structure and maintain the uniform rotation of a permanent magnet is a lie. Go force 2 magnets together so the like poles are facing each other, the uniform rotation of energy does not slow down when the energy you added to the system is removed. Since the energy is produced by rotation and the 2 magnets are rotating oppositly even tho they a like pole. Because the direction they are facing has changed. You have to be carefully using terms that arent well defined. And the orgin of the terms is not known.

[bdunham7]

You are correct, im conflating power an energy, since 1 is the measurement of the other. And in a 3 phase system, the total energy value propagated under the 2 electromagnetic waves is effectively a calculation of area under the wave.

Huh?  Power and energy are not measurements 'of each other'.  Their relationship is something else, which I challenge you to state correctly and cogently.  How does any of that address the error in your statement about the "laws of thermodynamics" , or known physical laws in general, not applying to superconductors? 

[Nonlinearplasma]

Another example to add to rubber, is tar. It fell of the back of a horse and cart in Wales and they mixted it in with the gravel and found it to hold the gravel together nicely.

Yes the plasma reactor could need a lot of trail and error like most other inventions do. And this obviously costs man hours and materials that cost money. The question is, will it bare fruits faster than all the money that is put into fusion. I say that is a no brainer since the energy source is similar to that found in a permanent magnet. Endless uniform rotation around 2 axis. With an exponential wave peak on the central z pinch polodial axis. Producing a static dipole and a rotating quadrupole to any stationary observer.

Until earth stops rotating, no on can say the stationary observer does not view a change in both the electric field and magnetic field because each time the quadrupole changes between north and south for the stationary observer he must view a change in both fields. Since every 90° is a north and the next 90 is south inside both north or south dipole.  This happens every 6 hours, and it effects the value of the dipole to the frame of reference.

[bdunham7]

Another example to add to rubber, is tar. It fell of the back of a horse and cart in Wales and they mixted it in with the gravel and found it to hold the gravel together nicely.

You're just full of heartwarming apocryphal stories, aren't you!  Perhaps when this episode is over you can pursue televangelism.

I say that is a no brainer since the energy source is similar to that found in a permanent magnet.

I have to say I pretty much agree with that statement....

[MK14]

Another example to add to rubber, is tar. It fell of the back of a horse and cart in Wales and they mixted it in with the gravel and found it to hold the gravel together nicely.

Thanks, that is interesting and good to know.   

The question is, will it bare fruits faster than all the money that is put into fusion. I say that is a no brainer since the energy source is similar to that found in a permanent magnet.

Well, I don't think permanent magnets, are considered a source of energy.  Apart from perhaps a quick/tiny release, when first used as a generator or similar.  E.g. A permanent magnet and suitable coil(s), can be used to make a torch/flashlight, which is charged up (capacitor inside as well), by shaking it vigorously, for a couple of minutes, roughly.  It then can light up its reasonably bright LED, for a short time, such as a couple of minutes.  After which, it gets dimmer and dimmer.

I don't think conventional/established physics, supports permanent magnets, being turned into free energy devices, is possible.  I don't want to say it would be impossible, because maybe, in a so far undiscovered way, it is possible.  But so far, there doesn't seem to be any indication that it would provide free energy, apart from the odd youtube video.  Which is usually made by people trying to scam money out of others and/or is dishonest about the results (e.g. secret hidden batteries, they don't tell you about), and/or they are deeply mixed up and confused about how real physics works.

[hexreader]

To correctly harness the power in the simple superconducting ring with a continuous current, the poloidal axis must be also made of superconducting material. Not doing so would be the equivalent of using air instead of iron in a transformer. This is why the plasma reactors poloidal energy level will be so high from the exponential wave peak inducing ridiculous levels of current into the superconducting z pinch. Once the plasma leaves the z pinch the resistance increase and the plasma slows and expands. If it hits plasma current travelling anti parallel then it must expand with explosive force. Aka anti gravity.

Creating anti gravity seems worthy of a Nobel Prize all by itself.
Do you really think that you will be able to do that? 

[RJSV]

   Thinking about this whole thread, relating computer generated AI as a 'fake human postings', probably won't be long, before a TOTALLY FAKED HUMAN AI, could be fed this 'material' and derive a learned style.
Course here, that means mis-spelled words, at some high rate.  My smartphone (Android) usually does some measure of correction / substitution, and I don't perceive any level of auto-spell in those pile upon pile of posts.  But, an AI doing this COULD learn that, and, perhaps not quite be able to use subtle approach, like only mis-spelling rarely.  But the OP posts here, just pile on the spelling errors.  I guess, respect levels afforded to eevblog folks reading is like, zero priority to OP.
  BUT, there might be some MAPPING techniques, maybe termed 'Metadata', which could uncover unexpected timing and patterns, in OP 's weave.
Like, a MAP, that would diagram these bizarre non-answers, certainly a set pattern in some of that, like:
   Are we to believe, can you dis-prove, that spinning esocepharious rotation, as helix ?
No, you cannot.  But, if you are that stupid, how come helix, are we to believe, that plus signs, created by 3D to 2D mapping....(on and on).
But my point is, a meta-data approach to these crazed posts, by OP, would look like this:
   Are we to believe, that, in outer planets [SUBJECT SWITCH], and how would you ? [STRAY QUESTION] ?
Then, can you disprove that ferdals [NONSENSE WORD] would rotate [in-coherent] ?

   See what I mean ?  It would be a metadata screen that would flag these structures, especially when they certainly SEEM like nonsense.  That, almost, could be an APP for a smartphone.  That way, a reader could have an (impartial) guage, for some measure of credibility vs. having to plow through this, 'manually'.
For similar example, this APP / BOT could give a quantitative measure, of TECH terms 'longevity' inside the document (posts).  If it says 'z-pinch' only once, that's gonna be suspect, but if that particular term is repeated, mildly, like 4 times throughout, then a credibility factor would be higher, like 1.83 vs 0. 008 which indicates the machine generated 'credibility' likelyhood.

[bdunham7]

For similar example, this APP / BOT could give a quantitative measure, of TECH terms 'longevity' inside the document (posts).  If it says 'z-pinch' only once, that's gonna be suspect, but if that particular term is repeated, mildly, like 4 times throughout, then a credibility factor would be higher, like 1.83 vs 0. 008 which indicates the machine generated 'credibility' likelyhood.

So you are going to invent the AI-augmented monkey w/ typewriter! 

[Nonlinearplasma]

Well, I don't think permanent magnets, are considered a source of energy.  Apart from perhaps a quick/tiny release, when first used as a generator or similar.  E.g. A permanent magnet and suitable coil(s), can be used to make a torch/flashlight, which is charged up (capacitor inside as well), by shaking it vigorously, for a couple of minutes, roughly.  It then can light up its reasonably bright LED, for a short time, such as a couple of minutes.  After which, it gets dimmer and dimmer.

I don't think conventional/established physics, supports permanent magnets, being turned into free energy devices, is possible.  I don't want to say it would be impossible, because maybe, in a so far undiscovered way, it is possible.  But so far, there doesn't seem to be any indication that it would provide free energy, apart from the odd youtube video.  Which is usually made by people trying to scam money out of others and/or is dishonest about the results (e.g. secret hidden batteries, they don't tell you about), and/or they are deeply mixed up and confused about how real physics works.

Permanent magnets are a source of energy, in the same way the electrostatic force is a source of energy.

If you want to utilise the static force you have to input energy to get motion. We do this by utilizing the z pinch effect of the wave on the poloidal axis. Either end of the magnet. A magnet is not a superconductor of another polidal wave such as electricity being induced into the magnet. Only an actual super conductor can do that. However the wave generated by its own atomic structure continues is if there is no resistance to it. This generates a static dipole and a rotating multipole. This can be seen by a simple motor made out of a wire and a AAA battery. If you change the pole but dont change the polarity of the current. 1 circuit spins slightly fast than the other. This is the interaction with the multipole on the polarity of the current.

The plasma reactor is not static. It is rotating. Although i say it similar to a magnet. This turns its not so static dipole into a generator, just like the Earth or the Sun becomes a self sustaining dyanmo, so will the plasma reactor.

Now we still have 1 more major consideration to think about with the plasma toroid. As was mention earlier.

A simple superconductor model can posit a superconducting ring with a continuous current and a resultant magnetic field, and indeed if the superconductor has R=0 and I=something, V=something X 0  = 0.  That just means that the power dissipated by the system is zero, not that the energy is zero.  You can calculate the energy of the circulating elecrons with ordinary known laws of physics.

I also thought this was correct, we could roughly calculate the electron current in a toroid with electrical laws and come out with some form of energy in the system. So i tried, so i used the values of the electric and magnetic field of the electron traveling in the opposite direction of the positive plasma. Let say; The electron has a positive value in the electric field @ the 12 oclock position.  What does the positive plasma particle value at the same position? Negative? And here in lies the problem with having a Neutron spinning the opposite way to the Proton and then it is termed neutral. While having an electron that is negative that can also have a positive field or energy value. Then you have to consider that both these waves and energy values must meet on the polidal axis who location cant even see negative.

So how do we calculated the positive plasma current and the negative electron current on the Z-pinch of the toroid inside a Star or Plasma Reactor. We have to lose the electron as the opposite of the proton, the laws of the universe say there can only be 1 opposite for every perspective. The wave function of the hydrogen is the key to understanding an electron. Combined with the ferro fluid over a magnet. The electron is the quadrupole change converging on the polidal axis of the wave function. Like planet earth the polidal wave compresses into an exponential peak and can be considered to be 4 seperate waves looping back over to meet the wave on the equatorial axis. The creates loops and nodes of energy just like the ferro fluid over a magnet. The electron can be considered the peak point of the standing wave to the observer. In the wave function you can see the wave change orginate due to the roll around the toroidal axis of the hydrogen nucleus. This is the quadrupole. When the rotating component of each quadrupole and the static wave of each dipole meet back at the equator they form rotating standing waves of energy, they rotate in pair as they meet from either dipole. This process forms the electron shells. The magnetic waves of the sun from the same standing waves that rotate helping planets rotate and obviously the Earth has the moon as an electron.

My point here is the electron energy is much lower than the wave of the positive protron and neutron. Due to the inverse square law for waves travelling away from source. The plasma current in a superconducting toroid, plus the "electron" wave current all have to meet on the polidal axis.that a lot of energy and its all rotating so its not static.

To be honest it doesnt matter if you call it an electron, their is a wave travelling backward and plasma travelling forward, and they form an never ending loop of energy, that also rotates and compress plasma on the z pinch. The math for the energy is hard to know, but who really cares we know its more than fusion, because this powers the Earth and fusion doesnt.

[RJSV]

bdunham7 I'll have to go read about that loose monkey thing, thanks.
   I'm thinking, assuming there is a large SET, of previously 'manually' screened documents, deemed as high probability of being valid.  A 'valid' document might mention some term, like 'wire gauge', a certain number of times, let's say 5.  That passed the 'smell test'.  Then, exposing some AI system to that, then the AI system 'learns'...in this case that term would be expected to occur, like 3.41 times, in a bunch of 'valid' documents.  Now that I'm considering this 'machine learning', the office staff could also 'feed' the new machine with documents flagged as 'highly suspect', of containing 'word salad', like, for instance, an occurrence of 'Z-pinch' (Sounds like Inspector Clueso),
where 'Z-pinch' only occurs once, in a 18 page document.  In a way, my musings on AI require a fairly robust 'teaching' process, in that highly subjective judgement, of what's 'sounding' reasonable, or not reasonable.
   Going a bit further, the AI system could also screen for 'functional' verification.  Like, for example, a 'circit designer' AI BOT would know how to apply concepts like Vbe, on a transistor, when checking and gauging for likelyhood of credible text streams.  And, like I said, an originator of 'word salad' BS could, cleverly, mis-spell at some deliberate, random looking rate.  That's the 'Bad Breath' tactic seen in Terminator movie Robots disguise.
Sorry, I know I'm likely thinking way behind...like 1990's estimate of an AI setup.
  But certainly, having an APP like that might be entertaining to observe in action, including, like this Non-linear case, including inserting various hostile, paranoid responses.  "That dude got MAD", you might observe, ..."...and so probably isn't a BOT".
Sounds like an artificial intelligence world of treachery / deceit, with several computers hashing it out...while us 'Humans' watch, from sidelines.

[TimFox]

A permanent magnet stores energy in the same sense that a Duracell alkaline cell stores energy.
To magnetize the material at the magnet factory, electrical power is applied through an appropriate coil  see section 10 of  https://www.intemag.com/magnet-design-guide
To get (electrical) power out of a permanent-magnet generator, (mechanical) power is applied to the rotor shaft while the magnet stays magnetized.
Obtaining energy by demagnetizing the magnet is certainly possible, but rarely used for any practical purpose.

[Nonlinearplasma]

Creating anti gravity seems worthy of a Nobel Prize all by itself.
Do you really think that you will be able to do that? 

Creating anti gravity was done by the right brother, actually who ever invented the first curved surface to generate lift gets the credit for anti gravity.

Eric Laithwaite also created anti gravity with the maglev system.

Although i would say the Solar Cycle Magnetic Field change and its mechanism is worthy of a Nobel Prize. It made sense to me instantly when i looked at the field structure between solar min and max and i find it difficult to see how it can be refuted even with current understanding of superconducting magnetic field lines, and penning traps. Combined with the confirmation of the rotation speed of the equator in comparison to the polar region of the Sun as proof of the mechanism. This to me confirm the plasma reactors validly as an invention worthy of funding. Even if you see it as a gamble, the odds are higher than fusion already and the reward is even higher.

When the plasma reactor is built it will repels the earths atmosphere magnetic field if the correct dipole is facing Earth. Super conductors always match the strongest field they are in. It will depend on the strength of the field we are using to control the plasma and if we can match it to earths field. First reactor is getting bolted to the ground with away of measureing for sure. I hope Eric Laithwaite left us plenty info on how to stabilize the fields.

You can also use this as a power source of another technology. Something like the us navy patent on using microwaves to change the density around a craft to create lift. It is designed for space but maybe power restrictions limit its use close to home.

[TimFox]

Aerodynamic lift (as in the right spelling of Wright Brothers)
and magnetic force in the vertical direction (as in MagLev)
are not antigravity.
The net force on an object, per Newton, is the vector sum of all the forces acting upon it.
Gravity (always positive) is but one of the forces.

[Nonlinearplasma]

A permanent magnet stores energy in the same sense that a Duracell alkaline cell stores energy.
To magnetize the material at the magnet factory, electrical power is applied through an appropriate coil  see section 10 of  https://www.intemag.com/magnet-design-guide
To get (electrical) power out of a permanent-magnet generator, (mechanical) power is applied to the rotor shaft while the magnet stays magnetized.
Obtaining energy by demagnetizing the magnet is certainly possible, but rarely used for any practical purpose.

So the static magnetic field of the Earth and Sun that is rotating must generated energy, correct?

If it generates energy then its the power source and fusion is the by product

[RJSV]

My point is made, just above, where OP's response features only ONE mention, of some specific feature term, that term NEVER revisited, or expanded upon again through the whole post.
   Contrast that, with more usual narratives, where some term used, like 'heavier gauge wire' might be encountered a few times, during 'natural' unfolding of some document...  If is a building high rise, for example, the terms 'floor' or 'stairs' might most naturally occur several times.  Of course that could be adopted by your 'BOT', also, eventually.  Sounds like a spy competing with spy, in ever more complex sets of deception.

[RJSV]

...oh, and notice, that smarty-BOT, seems to ignore certain questions, while virtually answering others in very rapid pace.  Some instant, other answers never come.  Could still, be a BOT we got on our hands.  Go round and round.
   Of course, a clever BOT could also show 'impatience' at random intervals, too, to show how un-bot it is.

[TimFox]

A permanent magnet stores energy in the same sense that a Duracell alkaline cell stores energy.
To magnetize the material at the magnet factory, electrical power is applied through an appropriate coil  see section 10 of  https://www.intemag.com/magnet-design-guide
To get (electrical) power out of a permanent-magnet generator, (mechanical) power is applied to the rotor shaft while the magnet stays magnetized.
Obtaining energy by demagnetizing the magnet is certainly possible, but rarely used for any practical purpose.

So the static magnetic field of the Earth and Sun that is rotating must generated energy, correct?

If it generates energy then its the power source and fusion is the by product

Of course not.
The interaction of the magnetic field of a rotating object with the rest of the universe removes energy from the rotating body.
Just like an eddy-current brake in a simple electromechanical system.

[MK14]

Permanent magnets are a source of energy, in the same way the electrostatic force is a source of energy.

Are you saying, that if a permanent magnet is taken, and installed into the appropriate machine/contraption/device, it can supply significant/huge amounts of power, for a virtually unlimited amount of time and power output.  Such as powering lamps, motors, radios, TVs, computers, heaters, air-conditioners, cars etc ?

If so, can you supply me with any evidence, that, such a system or systems, already exist, in the way of actual experiment(s) and/or device(s), which have been demonstrated.

Attempting to explain it to me, with a large text explanation, does not really work for me.  I'd need to see it from an official source and/or real life, testable/repeatable experiments.

N.B.  There maybe various youtube videos, demonstrating things like that.  But be warned, I (and others here), will immediately say, if we think it is a scam, or has a secretly hidden battery or mains connection, etc.

[Nonlinearplasma]

Aerodynamic lift (as in the right spelling of Wright Brothers)
and magnetic force in the vertical direction (as in MagLev)
are not antigravity.
The net force on an object, per Newton, is the vector sum of all the forces acting upon it.
Gravity (always positive) is but one of the forces.

Lift is ion wave defraction in the medium. Which is measured and modelled by the differential equations of Coulomb's law. This is Einstein unified theory. Its a plasma universe, it all comes down to how 360° of helical wave induce current at 90° to the second axis. Once you understand the helical wave of the atomic structure of the magnet and the pole created as the wave meets on both faces and shots outward and around. The field lines repersent the polidal axis of rotation of the wave and the arrows repersents the flight direction of the wave, not the propagation direction. Maxwell proved magnetic fields propagate, that means it must be a wave because that the only way magnetic field can. But it does so in both directions. Each pole can then be consider 2 wave when it meets back at the equator, forming loops and nodes with the equatorial wave. This feature is important when considering solar system orbitals. Again included in a graphic. But you have to study closely to see it.