Youve asked a lot of questions and i just gave you the best and most recent papers on MHD self sustaining dynamo, Plasmoid thrust and the explosive growth of non linear magnetic islands. When you say i need acceptance in the acedemic community and i gave you the papers that they have already accepted from others research. Which i assume you all ignored. As stated previously i have not given any information for the actual acedemic community to agree with, unless you think a cosmology forum is full of actual professor of acedemia.
Turning a possibly valid idea, supported by research paper(s), which shows that something might work, at a minute, atomic level. Doesn't mean that you can take that idea, and then say "I've invented that/this", give me $15,000,000 to pursue it.
Analogy and question (some/all details made up, for analogy):
What would you say to me, if I suggested the following:
There is a research paper, saying that a tiny atomic particle, might be persuaded to 'teleport' a tiny distance. It might even 'time travel', at the same time. E.g. A Quantum tunneling effect.
Does that mean I can dictate a patent pending application, then request $15,00,000 from a suitable online funding organisation. Because I plan to make a teleporting and time traveling machine, which I've already got the patent for, and I want to call it, a 'Tardis', ("Time And Relative Dimension In Space",
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TARDIS ).
When I was 12, I made a paper-mâché version of a Dalek, so feel 100% confident in supporting my claims.
What would you say?
Good idea, here's £10,000 towards your goal, and good luck?
Or, I'm sorry, I'm not 100% convinced that your idea, is 100% sound, even if you did make a nice Darlek, a while ago?
N.B. Please don't take my post as a fun making exercise. I'm trying to ILLUSTRATE a point here.