I see, so you can't accuse a women of mansplaining.
And you shouldn't accuse men of that either, when you refuse to define "man" or "woman". The silliness happens, when you use the term, but refuse to define "man", because you're using a term you cannot define. And that is most of the people who seriously use the term "to mansplain".
To be honest, I think the 'splaining is just a derogatory way of describing how men, especially fathers,
intuitively describe things. The female/mother counterpart, in my opinion, would be to describe an event, by describing how humans perceiving the event felt and experienced it, with many diversions describing each persons relationship with everyone else.
Just thought of something:
It would probably short-circuit an intersectionalists mind, if you asked them whether a trans-man can be accused of mansplaining!
Not all men mansplain, and I've met women (definitely female, with
XY XX chromosomes – edit: was just a typo!) who tend to mansplain; one of them was an air stewardess, and mansplained to me about condensation, when I only asked her for a paper towel to dry my neck as the cold condensate happened to drip there. No, I never got a towel either; go figure.
I get enough crap because I'm so verbose –– it is not by choice; I've always been this analytical/descriptive/insistent on correctly describing my point ––, and know that one can easily create a derogatory term for every possible way of human interaction. So, I don't put much weight on such terms. I consider it just another diversion: when you cannot attack the argument at hand, you attack the person presenting the argument, so you can "win". A typical social game, which I utterly detest.