Actually even the 2nd video of the printing process (in their Kickstarter-Update #2), which they posted on request of many increasingly sceptic backers, they clearly faked that too. When you watch it, it's so obvious that they're not actually printing the object but just moving the x and y a bit and slowly lifting the head to reveal an already printed object (probably on a real PolyJet) behind the print head. Even with the video being a timelapse of the process one can clearly see that the z is moving up too fast compared to the movement of x and y (i downloaded the video and analysed it frame by frame). In some frames in the video one can see the reflection of the operator on the glossy surface (of the printer) moving, which then reveals that they have indeed choosen a very short timelapse interval (or even no real timelapse but just speed up the video after recording).
Then there is absolutely no sign of any UV or blue light reflecting off the object and off the build surface or at least being visible scattering through the translucent support material, which should absolutely be visible given the light intensity needed for the process, even if they use a laser. That should be absolutely obvious, when you look at videos from the printing process on a real PolyJet and even SLA-Printers with Lasers. There is only the light of a rather faint blue LED lighting their Logo on the build head from behind. There are so many things wrong and stupidly faked in their video, that i can't even cover them all here.
I'm a backer of their Kickstarter too, but if they don't get their act together and show that they indeed have a working prototype, i'm going to cancel my pledge. Sadly by now i'm actually not very positive that they will be able to show anything convincing.
Regards
Neni