Peeves: Getting "ignored" on an audiophile forum for describing how the master clock in I2S is just used a as the "CLK>" input for the I2S peripheral.
Actually that's probably not a peeve but an achievement.
Audiophiles
No just that. Audiophiles in general. This time, in particular is people trying to use a couple of raspberry PIs running on super capacitors to avoid master clock jitter, by creating a synchronous buffered, asynchronous FIFO.
The surprising thing is how many people are throwing money at this sh1t. As far as I can determine the ONLY thing this setup achieves is creating really, really long buffers of megabytes in size and potentially hours in duration synchronising two streams they just make asynchronous. It's baffling. It has a net ZERO effect.
Then you have people claiming they can HEAR a difference. Even when you point out it takes light longer to get from your speakers to your eyes than the maximum 180* phase shift on a masterclock!
I have to stop reading these audiophool forums or I'm going to end up insulting someone.
Not suprised since they believe in cables altering what they hear (it does not, if the cable is minimally well build any cable is transparent) and that cable risers, power plugs and specialist capacitors introduce "warm" and "Soundstage" and make records "sound better" than the original medium they are stored...
That is my biggest way to screw them, specially when they start with "Skin effect" theories and "stable voltage" plus "attenuation"... Kudos for the users than then post this link for this study:
http://boson.physics.sc.edu/~kunchur/papers/Interconnect-cable-measurements--Kunchur.pdfBut fail to understand what is show in the paper and that the changes is in a range of magnitude higher than the 20Hz to 20000Hz of our human hearing.
I like audio, I like to hear a good music on my system but no way in hell I would spend thousands in cables.
I build my cables using Mogami, Canare or Sommer wiring together with Neutrik or Amphenol connectors, including sleeving not because I believe that they will change my perception and improve my music analysis skills but because they are more robust by using good connections and proper copper and look good, even if after being connected I don't see them anymore.
I also use cable stands made by me using wood not because it increases "the soundstage" but because it is easier to clean the floor by moving them, while the cable gets less dirty and gunk up by not being on the floor
Over all I spent in all, with my soldering, way less than one speaker cable from AudioQuest, while looking as good as then and doing exactly the same thing: connecting the amplifier to the speakers..
Nothing less, nothing more...
There's some audiophool equipment that I think has artistic value. I'm not going to claim that it sounds better, but I'm sure a lot of it sounds very good, once you cross a certain threshold of quality that is not hard to achieve with modern technology, you can pretty easily get very good sound. The value of art is subjective, there are sculptures that are worth millions of dollars that you don't even *do* anything at all. I'd sooner spend $100k on a really unique looking turntable that I can use to play records than on a sculpture that just sits there.
Then I suggest the one I would love to own:
https://maglevaudio.com/Not because I believe that my vinyl records will sound better than when they were pressed but because is a beauty to see it start up and work, and a excellent conversation starter to any person who visits your house.
https://youtu.be/rOtbBQJDLQg