Microsoft Word - Bring back the talking paper clip I say.
You guys aren't software enginers... have a crack.
String input = "5.56 5.58 5.54 5.48 5.54 5.59 5.52";
...
One silver star for mentioning the basic
string.split syntax that's used across many languages. But only for a script kiddie/trainee programmer. However, if I'm looking for a
software engineer (whatever that is), I would be expecting a response showing knowledge of Regular Expression group capturing. With an extra stars for implicit format validation,
for-each iteration and maybe questioning why the data is in such a bad format. More stars for mentioning
string.format, boxing, floating point number characteristics, localization, ISO character sets, buffers, pointers, structs, arrays, etc, etc. Really this is a question that helps the interviewer discover what the candiate knows about
data mangling.
As for your candidate who did not park his phone in voice mail mode, did he realise where he was? Maybe he thought he was doing
you the favour, what with this shortage of highly qualifed IT workers under the age of 13?
Recruiters are pretty bad at filtering out the chaff unfortunately (and they still somehow get 15-20% of first year salary, it seems insane to me.)
And THIS is the BIG problem across the engineering industry. Some 25 year's ago, businesses decided they no longer needed a recruitment function as, this can be contracted out to some high performance recruitment agency. A quarter of a century ago, the agent would have known their boolean from their bollocks because they were ex-industry. Today, the recruitment sector is just one giant file forwarding marketplace populated by Gen-Z wannabes whome, know nothing about the industry in which they claim to have excelled. It's all going rather Dilbert...
Manger: Find me candidates who are top their game
Recruitment consultant: I've hundred's, no thousands on my database!
Manager: Great, send me their CV's!
Dogbert: Please God is there anyone can spell
curriculum vitae?