Author Topic: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.  (Read 627274 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mendip_discovery

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 998
  • Country: gb
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3500 on: March 30, 2023, 12:00:06 pm »
The UK gives you!!!!   Blair-ite qualifications for everyone initiative.

Solution.  Invent acedemic subjects that didn't exist before and give people qualifications in them.  Make Britian more qualified!  Makes sense, no?  No, didn't think so.

"Media Studies".  This was taken too seriously by the media, who started hirering them!

Never understood the rabid hatred of vocational courses. Btw I did media studies at college. I wanted to be a sports photographer so I looking for a photography course at college, there wasnt enough students for it so I took media. There I learnt html(css), flash, director, graphic design, photography, ran a radio station (oddly I was the station engineer), we made short films. Of the students several have ended up in local radio as presenters, some went on to do film work. I did another two years at uni doing a dedicated photography course. It's just a sham that when you go to get a job all the want is cheap but with experience rather than training. The photography I wanted to get into ended up being a bit crap as it turns out that the industry is designed to keep new people out and its who you know rather than what you know.


Motorcyclist, Nerd, and I work in a Calibration Lab :-)
--
So everyone is clear, Calibration = Taking Measurement against a known source, Verification = Checking Calibration against Specification, Adjustment = Adjusting the unit to be within specifications.
 

Offline paulca

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4280
  • Country: gb
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3501 on: March 30, 2023, 12:49:25 pm »
The UK gives you!!!!   Blair-ite qualifications for everyone initiative.

Solution.  Invent acedemic subjects that didn't exist before and give people qualifications in them.  Make Britian more qualified!  Makes sense, no?  No, didn't think so.

"Media Studies".  This was taken too seriously by the media, who started hirering them!

Never understood the rabid hatred of vocational courses. Btw I did media studies at college. I wanted to be a sports photographer so I looking for a photography course at college, there wasnt enough students for it so I took media. There I learnt html(css), flash, director, graphic design, photography, ran a radio station (oddly I was the station engineer), we made short films. Of the students several have ended up in local radio as presenters, some went on to do film work. I did another two years at uni doing a dedicated photography course. It's just a sham that when you go to get a job all the want is cheap but with experience rather than training. The photography I wanted to get into ended up being a bit crap as it turns out that the industry is designed to keep new people out and its who you know rather than what you know.

Fair enough.  I think it's just that a lot of media studies students end up reporting for the BBC et. al. and are the source of poor research examples.

My brother did a similar course here in "Bangor" a few decades back.  He was in the performing arts course, which had it's own recording study and constantly producing live music events for the tech and wider social circle.  They also go the oppurtunity to run/manage/present on the temporary radio licenses they got every year for 3 or 4 months.

I even "performed" on live radio.  "performed", my job was running an Amiga 500 with an active sampler, bank of premade samples and an effects processor.  I had one channel on the desk which I was allowed to touch and much to my Brothers (running the rest of the live desk) discomfort I was doing absolutely mad stuff like routing the send to my sampler, then back to the desk and routing my effects return back to the sampler creating a feedback loop through teh sampler.  Shifting the delays and effects on that feedback started producing some seriously cool sounding electronic torture "music" as that was the genre at hand. 

Dropping key quotes out of Sci-Fi films or completely out of context movie lines over the top of the music was my main job.  Running 5 minutes of a Ren and Stimpy episode in the background with a pitch shifting delay was my idea too.  It's amazing how well Ren and Stimpy always seem to line up hilarious quotes right before the beat drop!
"What could possibly go wrong?"
Current Open Projects:  STM32F411RE+ESP32+TFT for home IoT (NoT) projects.  Child's advent xmas countdown toy.  Digital audio routing board.
 
The following users thanked this post: RJSV

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3502 on: April 01, 2023, 02:16:27 am »
Veterinarians.

Just because my cat chooses to have a vegan diet like the rest of us isn't the reason why he's sick.
iratus parum formica
 

Offline IDEngineer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1941
  • Country: us
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3503 on: April 01, 2023, 03:16:14 am »
Well, it turns out that the feline digestive system is that of an obligate carnivore. They must eat meat, period. If a cat only eats vegetables it will be malnourished.
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk, bookaboo, tooki, george.b, paulca

Offline eti

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1801
  • Country: gb
  • MOD: a.k.a Unlokia, glossywhite, iamwhoiam etc
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3504 on: April 04, 2023, 06:57:17 am »
People who save screenshots, or convert them to... JPG! |O :-DD

Amateur hour. This ain't 1995! - it's PNG - any Apple pro knows this (Apple being the definition of high quality codecs, formats etc).

If you worked for me and I caught you doing such a thing, you'd get ONE warning, then OUT!  ;) :P
« Last Edit: April 04, 2023, 06:59:09 am by eti »
 

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3505 on: April 04, 2023, 07:07:17 am »
People who save screenshots, or convert them to... JPG! |O :-DD

Amateur hour. This ain't 1995! - it's PNG - any Apple pro knows this (Apple being the definition of high quality codecs, formats etc).

If you worked for me and I caught you doing such a thing, you'd get ONE warning, then OUT!  ;) :P

My flagship Android doesn't play nice with PNG.
iratus parum formica
 

Offline PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7302
  • Country: va
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3506 on: April 04, 2023, 10:52:36 am »
Quote
If you worked for me and I caught you doing such a thing, you'd get ONE warning, then OUT!

Highly unlikely, on both counts.

As a quick test I took an A4 jpg (an invoice, scanned from the paper version) which was 1.8MB in size, and converted it to png. That took many seconds (perhaps 10-15) which surprised me. The result was an 8MB png. So I took that and converted it to jpg which resulted in an instant (like no time for progress bars) 1.3MB copy.

(I find the second conversion being smaller not relevant - the original was scanned using 100% quality, whereas the conversion would use 95%. None of them - jpg1, png, jpg2 - were distinguishable when comparing to each other.)
« Last Edit: April 04, 2023, 11:48:47 am by PlainName »
 

Offline mendip_discovery

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 998
  • Country: gb
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3507 on: April 04, 2023, 11:45:35 am »
People who save screenshots, or convert them to... JPG! |O :-DD

Amateur hour. This ain't 1995! - it's PNG - any Apple pro knows this (Apple being the definition of high quality codecs, formats etc).

If you worked for me and I caught you doing such a thing, you'd get ONE warning, then OUT!  ;) :P

PNG isnt the best thing for every image. I have had it generate quite large files. Even on screenshots. It's just a posh gif image.

Jpg has it uses and I was amused to find that a progressive loading jpg has a smaller file size than a normal one. Same quality settings.

I have been known to go gif and drop the pallet down until the file is as small as I can get it. I learnt web design during the 56k era.

At least it's not that google image format. The least said about that the better.
Motorcyclist, Nerd, and I work in a Calibration Lab :-)
--
So everyone is clear, Calibration = Taking Measurement against a known source, Verification = Checking Calibration against Specification, Adjustment = Adjusting the unit to be within specifications.
 

Offline shapirus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1625
  • Country: ua
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3508 on: April 04, 2023, 12:36:45 pm »
Not sure what this discussion is about. Of course every image format has its use. Screenshots, or at least those where important information is text or UI elements, must be saved in a format with lossless compression, essentially meaning PNG.
 

Offline CirclotronTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3337
  • Country: au
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3509 on: April 04, 2023, 12:47:01 pm »
When the print screen has a reduced color pallet, with big areas of the exact same color, PNG works better.
TIFF works pretty well for that situation too.
 

Online Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7126
  • Country: ca
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3510 on: April 04, 2023, 03:05:42 pm »
Just do not save chart/graph screenshots in JPG please  >:(
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3511 on: April 04, 2023, 05:44:17 pm »
IIRC .png showed up primarily because of licensing fees required by .jpg, I don't remember the exact details but it was something that came up with a product I worked on ~20 years ago.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2023, 05:31:55 pm by james_s »
 

Offline shapirus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1625
  • Country: ua
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3512 on: April 04, 2023, 05:58:31 pm »
IIRC .png showed up primarily because of licensing feeds required by .jpg, I don't remember the exact details but it was something that came up with a product I worked on ~20 years ago.
by GIF.
 

Offline tiggerlator

  • Contributor
  • !
  • Posts: 32
  • Country: gb
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3513 on: April 04, 2023, 07:41:19 pm »
For me it's the terms Pal or bro, I find pal an intimidating term, and i am not your bro.
 
The following users thanked this post: eti

Offline eti

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1801
  • Country: gb
  • MOD: a.k.a Unlokia, glossywhite, iamwhoiam etc
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3514 on: April 04, 2023, 07:54:12 pm »
For me it's the terms Pal or bro, I find pal an intimidating term, and i am not your bro.

"Pal" is condescending, cold, sounds like someone wants to start a fight. Unless I am a tin of dog food, I ain't "Pal" to you.
"Bro" is cringey yank slang (not ALL their slang is bad) - I am not your "bro", you assume too much  ;D
 
The following users thanked this post: RJSV

Online SiliconWizard

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15423
  • Country: fr
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3515 on: April 04, 2023, 07:59:04 pm »
'sup bro
 :-DD
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8551
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3516 on: April 04, 2023, 08:43:58 pm »
M D Headley, in her 2020 translation of Beowulf, used "Bro!" for the untranslatable Old English word "Hwæt" in the first line.
 

Offline Sredni

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 746
  • Country: aq
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3517 on: April 04, 2023, 09:43:00 pm »
M D Headley, in her 2020 translation of Beowulf, used "Bro!" for the untranslatable Old English word "Hwæt" in the first line.

Ignorant me thought Beowulf was a German poem.  :palm:

But... "Bro!"? I mean... bro...

Anyway, out of curiosity I found this: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/listen-beowulf-opening-line-misinterpreted-for-200-years-8921027.html



All instruments lie. Usually on the bench.
 

Offline CirclotronTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3337
  • Country: au
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3518 on: April 04, 2023, 09:53:07 pm »

"Bro" is cringey yank slang (not ALL their slang is bad)
Indeed.
I think the expression “goofing off” is a real gem.  :)
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8551
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3519 on: April 04, 2023, 10:54:30 pm »
Headley spends a few pages in the introduction to her published translation about "Bro!" in the first line.
She imagines a competitive conversation at a bar between a male group, where "bro" can be either friend or foe, while at least feigning friendship.
The first three lines of the original poem:
Hwæt. We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
(Spell-check rejects each word, except for "We" and "in".)
« Last Edit: April 04, 2023, 10:56:05 pm by TimFox »
 

Offline eti

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1801
  • Country: gb
  • MOD: a.k.a Unlokia, glossywhite, iamwhoiam etc
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3520 on: April 04, 2023, 11:09:57 pm »
'sup bro
 :-DD

There’s always that one ain’t there 😂
 

Offline eti

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1801
  • Country: gb
  • MOD: a.k.a Unlokia, glossywhite, iamwhoiam etc
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3521 on: April 04, 2023, 11:12:15 pm »

"Bro" is cringey yank slang (not ALL their slang is bad)
Indeed.
I think the expression “goofing off” is a real gem.  :)

So did he:
« Last Edit: April 05, 2023, 06:55:22 pm by eti »
 

Offline shapirus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1625
  • Country: ua
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3522 on: April 05, 2023, 08:18:21 am »
Organizations like NASA bending to stupid whims of noisy schmucks in the fear of being publicly bullied. Things like this must never happen. A bunch of madmen must not affect the actions of sane people.

Quote
A new NASA policy makes it unlikely future missions will be named after individuals in response to the controversy surrounding the naming of the James Webb Space Telescope.
 
The following users thanked this post: RJSV

Offline paulca

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4280
  • Country: gb
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3523 on: April 05, 2023, 12:06:50 pm »
For me it's the terms Pal or bro, I find pal an intimidating term, and i am not your bro.

"Pal" is condescending, cold, sounds like someone wants to start a fight. Unless I am a tin of dog food, I ain't "Pal" to you.
"Bro" is cringey yank slang (not ALL their slang is bad) - I am not your "bro", you assume too much  ;D

"What could possibly go wrong?"
Current Open Projects:  STM32F411RE+ESP32+TFT for home IoT (NoT) projects.  Child's advent xmas countdown toy.  Digital audio routing board.
 

Offline RJSV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2506
  • Country: us
Re: Your pet peeve, technical or otherwise.
« Reply #3524 on: April 07, 2023, 02:44:03 am »
Reminds me:
   In Europe, people seem to work, study fairly seriously, but, alas here in the U.S.A. folks are more like talking in broken English:
   "...Do he code ? ".      Followed by laughter, as they think technology is some nerdy joke pursuit.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf