E.g. https://www.petri.com/windows-10-ignoring-hosts-file-specific-name-resolution
Haha. Oh, MS, you never cease to amaze me in how user-hostile you can get.
My policy is that I'll stick with Win7 until it becomes nonviable, then move to Linux. Unless MS does a complete 180 and launches Win11 with all the fucking nonsense stripped out, which is about as likely as me winning every lottery in the world at once.
What annoys me the most isn't that MS has completely fucked up everything they've touched the last 5 or so years, it's the apologists. "Oh, but the lusers can't be trusted with that", "I'm sure they would never abuse any collected data", "But this is the future, just accept it", "Once you get used to it you'll love it", and so on.
Really? Did you get Stockholm syndrome from a fucking OS upgrade, or are you just stupid?
I have no issue accepting that certain changes were needed due to your average luser fucking up their machine, but things like intentionally reverting settings and that sort of shit isn't fine. If MS made power users jump through hoops to set things (group policies, registry tweaks, etc), that'd be
fine. Just respect that people don't want all your new shit and let them use their own damn computer the way they want to.